Out of all the 2008 Presidential candidates, why is Ron Paul the only one the mainstream media is featuring?

Ron Paul is everywhere on tv, but what happened to Mitt Romney, Rudy Giulinai and all the rest of these shysters?

Public Comments

1. Because Ron Paul is the only one that is usually right BEFORE the fact aka Iraq, CRA, Fannie & Freddie, etc
2. It's not just Paul, Romney's greasy head has bobbed around my television screen recently.
3. They aren't doing as many interviews. That's about it. I've seen Romney do several. Not so much Giuliani. It's really up to them. Granted, Ron Paul does tend to have views that are "controversial", or radically different, like eliminating the fed. Which makes for better tv, when he rails against the entire system.
4. They don't have ideas we need to hear, right now. Ron Paul predicted the economic crises, was called a nut, and was proven to be correct. Guliani and Romney were smirking at him in the background of debates as he discussed the soon to crash economy as if he were some sort of loon. At this point, I don't think that helps their own economic credibility.
5. Huckabee and Romney have been seen on the networks also. Huckabee has recently tried sounding like ron paul on domestic economic issues, and he comes off as fake. His views are also extremely religious when it comes to making goverment decisions. Romney is greased up flip flopper who has also been interviewed. The Republican Party is in shambles they don;t know what to do. If anyone thinks that Sarah Palin is a good choice again they are out of their mind. Ron Paul should be seen more on television whether he runs in 2012 or not, because he is consistant with his views, and is most right on the economy and foreign policy abroad.
6. I think its because Ron Paul has been so right on so many different issues that they invite him to share some more of them.