Will you join me in the Ron Paul revolution?

"Ron Paul is a loon, got fewer than 20,000 votes in the general election, and will be 78 years old by the next election The Libertarian Party did not want him either." He got 20k votes despite not being on the write-in list on most states and after he told most of his supporters to NOT vote for him Also the Libertarian party sought out Ron Paul to run for them, but he turned them down.

Public Comments

1. YES! I have come to the conclusion that both political super parties are out for their own gain rather than the country's. I understand the moderate liberal as well as the moderate conservative, but I think a lot of the politicians on either far end of the spectrum are closed-minded megalomaniacs.
2. No I don't even know who Ron Paul is.
3. I already have. I just wish he would not run as a Republican.
4. No Ron Paul is a loon, got fewer than 20,000 votes in the general election, and will be 78 years old by the next election The Libertarian Party did not want him either.
5. No. Your idiot couldn't even get close to winning the Republican nomination. Think what he (wouldn't) 'd do in the general election.
6. Only if he becomes pro-choice
7. I already have... I'm trying to "recruit" more people. I wish I would have known more about him before the election!!
8. I just don't really understand what's going to happen if his views on economics and the government come true. Maybe if I better understood that I could join you.
9. No thanks, I'm more interested in supporting Sarah Palin. Harmony
10. HECK YES I will! He is pro-choice but thinks it should be up to the states to decide. He delivered 4,000 babies for Christ sake!
11. Ron Paul seems great, until you realize what his political views are.
12. YES!
13. Yes - I am a Ron Paul supporter. His ideas could save this country from becoming socialist.
14. No way. I hate capitalism.
15. Don't worry about the 20,000 votes guy. He is a troll. He has had what you said explained to him more than once. Thus, he is ignorant. You know people you don't have to support Ron Paul or even vote for him... but it wouldn't kill you to do some research (*gasp*) on WHY he holds the positions that he does (consistently for decades), with an open mind, and without preconceived notions. I assure you, there are intelligent reasons for all of them. The Constitution and history, mainly.
16. Here is something that everybody can do RIGHT NOW and that is if you are registered as a Democrat or Republican Change your registration to anything but Democrat or Republican! That will send a message that WE THE PEOPLE do not want just more dirty politics as usual! abandon the Donkey and the Elephant!
17. If you join me in the Libertarian revolution.
18. No, 40,000 were COUNTED since most states don't count votes where the candidate is not in fact running, we will never know how many votes he actually got. (In San Bernardino, one of Cas most populous counties they didn't count his votes although by law in CA they had to when his supporters filed without his agreement, a couple weeks before the election. I can only suspect he got more votes than they wanted to advertise. In California he is a 'touchy' subject because he would enforce immigration laws, due to the subsidies citizens have to pay for illegal immigrants and their families. ) He got 1.2 million votes in the primary. The Libertarian party internal polls showed he would win in a walk before they finally had to vote and he wasn't running for them. And he just tied for 3rd in the CPAC straw poll, with Sarah Palin, both one percent below Jindal. (Romney won with 20%.) r3VOLution.
19. You aren't going to convince people who say idiotic things such as that filth you quoted by pointing out the facts. They aren't going to listen because they are interested in distorting the facts (trying to correct them with facts is like trying to correct one of those idiots who thinks that Obama is a Muslim). Ron Paul got over 1 million votes in the Republican primary. He did not run in the general election (although he was placed on the ballots of 2 states), even though he could have had the nominations of both the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party (2 of the 3 major 3rd parties). Dr. Paul's age is not an important factor either. He's in good health and much younger than his age (in sharp contrast to John McCain) and probably will be capable of leading the country until around 2020 or so. He also has alot of support among Republican activists (at CPAC this week, he finished 3rd in a straw poll, narrowly behind Mitt Romney and Bobby Jindal, but ahead of Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, and Mike Huckabee). I voted for Dr. Paul last year and I hope to do so again in 2012 which will be the year we take the White House (if the Austrian economists are right about the effects of Obama's economic policies and if foreign policy continues to fade into the background).
20. Ron Paul received over 1.2 million votes in the Primaries, even after the Main Stream Media viciously attacked him and censored him at every turn. His following has only grown since the predictions he made about the economic collapse back in 2002 came true. He also warned that the Banker Bailouts would fail terribly, and guess what, credit markets are still shot and the DOW just keeps dropping while the private Federal Reserve has printed over 8.5 Trillion (according to Bloomberg) out of thin air. All the idiots who didn't pay any attention to what Paul had to say are going to be living in tent cities a year from now. Good luck, sheeple.........