Why does the media try to silence the Ron Paul Revolution?

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

Public Comments

1. You're all a bunch of social lepers. Get over it already and get some fresh air, instead spamming the Internet with your gibberish.
2. You are being over dramatic I believe. There is no Ron Paul revolution.
3. The way I see it, there are those fit to be President and there are those who aren't. For example, candidates like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee are all people who could uphold the Presidency. Candidates like Ron Paul, Alan Keyes, Mike Gravel and Bill Richardson aren't. Why do you think Ronald Reagan had a landslide against Walter Mondale, because Walter wasn't seen as someone who could be President. So what I'm trying to say is that Ron Paul just doesn't have what's needed to be President, it's something you're born with, you can't acquire it.
4. They didn't... They simply were able too quickly realize he and his followers were nuts and decided it would be better to ignore him and his sycophants. I mean it was his supporters on here spamming the polls and this site claiming it was proof Paul was going to win... and yet he came in 4th in a two horse race. How can they take paulnuts seriously? And as it turned out 99% of Americans didn't and don't take him seriously because they are atleast modestly intelegent and rational... unlike the truly loopy paulites. edit: By the way its not "rEVOLution" any more... it's "REVOlution" now... as it should be...
5. because it doesn't exist.
6. The socialists fear the truth
7. because Americans have turned out to be a bunch of politically correct namby pamby's. no one takes the time to read up and learn about Ron Paul. we are all like lambs being led to slaughter instead of rising up and taking our country back. our forefathers would be turning in our graves is they knew what our country has come to.
8. Ignoring Ron Paul and trying to silence him are two different things. The media is not obligated to pay attention to candidates that have no chance to win regardless of how much media attention is put on them.
9. paid spammers dont make a revolution. the media sees no revolution and simply calls it as it sees it. again, you cant stop what isnt here.