Why is Ron Paul not listed as one of our candidates considering he is now a top tier candidate?

He is now a front runner, why are you denying him attention? I have always been a big fan of Yahoo, and rarely will use google, but with your discrimination against ron paul, you are losing credibility, and you dont change soon you'll lose me along with many others to google.

Public Comments

1. How do you measure front runner?
2. Ron Paul does not reflect the current interests of the ruling elite. Therefore, he has been marginalized by their media in an attempt to make sure that he doesn't win the election -- at which point they would have to kill him.
3. Front runner? In your dreams! What have you been smoking, dude! Ron Paul has never be higher than 2% of the vote. The media doesn't talk about him since he is a meaningless candidate. There is no "discrimination" against Paul. There is no consiracy to silence him. His biggest support base is on the Internet. Paul is NOT our "best hope to beat Hillary." RON PAUL WILL LOOSE! He won't even get the nomination!
4. i agree, if it wasn't for all the crap that comes along with the goggle toolbar. id of left yahoo along time ago
5. It's hard to take someone seriously when they say "He will loose." Thanks Dizney, lol.
6. Well, Ron Paul is actually considered a second tier candidate and he is a front runner depending upon which poll your looking at. I personally am not denying him attention you need to ask the networks and radio stations that question. You are delusional and need psychological help if you think WE are denying anyone anything. And if you want to leave Yahoo answers like they say don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya!
7. I'm sorry, I've never heard of "Ron Paul" before. I would be willing to bet 90% of all voters are in the same boat! Instead of crying about google why not let people know where they can find out about your "candidate"?
8. he doesnt have the backing of the big neo/con talking head's,
9. You should know by now that even the pre-election is rigged nowadays. If you're a maverick candidate not marching in lockstep with the corporate message and not blessed by the military-industrial establishment, you're not going to be taken seriously by the media and you're not going to be paid attention to . . . as a Green party voter I know this to be true. Like Ralph Nader, Ron Paul is only a potential spoiler. His ideas aren't important enough to be included in a debate but the votes he'll "STEAL" from another candidate will be taken seriously so he has to be minimized and eliminated from the herd.