Barack Obama for President and Joe Biden for Vice President? Good ticket? Yes/No?

I like Obama, compared to McCain, but if Obama picks either Edwards or Clinton for his running mate, I'll seriously have to rethink voting for him seeing how I really don't like either Edwards and Clinton. I like Senator Joe Biden as a vice president. He's intelligent, has thoughts similar to Obama, and surely has Washington/Capital Hill influence and experience. I think he offsets Obama's weaknesses. So is Joe Biden a good choice for veep???

Public Comments

1. I like Biden but I like Edwards too.
2. No way. I don't like either one. I would like Hillary perhaps with Edwards. Obama could probably handle veep as well, which I wouldn't mind, but I wouldn't stand seeing Obama as president.
3. To answer your question; No, Joe Biden has more experience than Obama. Why put the stronger candidate as your VP.
4. I like Biden. Oh and this is to Hillary........ if it were all about experience it would be a Biden/Dodd ticket. Anyway...I would support that ticket. But I would also like to see Obama.Edwards. Hey you above me... Great answer but Cheney had more experience then Bush too.
5. Absolutely; he was the candidate I favored until he bowed out of the race.
6. You may as well start signing your property over to the government. They will both work hard to take it from you.
7. Geez. You must not feel that strongly for Obama if you are going to abandon him if he chooses someone other than Biden. You are dangerous.
8. Good ticket I would vote for them.
9. Biden is a bad choice for vice president -- he's from Delaware, so he doesn't provide geographical balance, plus he has foot-in-mouth syndrome. Obama needs to pick a VP with strong foreign policy credentials. The potential to swing a state would be a big asset as well (there has been a lot of debate as to whether VPs really matter in this regard, but it could be done). Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia would make a good choice, in my opinion. I'd also be happy with Gov. Bill Richardson, though I've heard that he has major bimbo issues.
10. I think Edwards is a more natural fit for the "change" theme that Obama wants, but BIden isn't a bad choice. Pros: Biden's 20+ years experience could offset Obama's relative lack of experience. Biden's foreign policy experience (Chairman of Foreign Relations Committee) complements Obama's lack of experience as well. Biden also doesn't bring the high negatives of a Hillary Clinton if he were to be the VP. Cons: It's hard for Obama to embrace "change" when he claims a career politician like Biden as a VP. Delaware doesn't exactly bring a lot of electorial votes. Biden didn't exactly light up the crowds in his Presidential run.
11. The Obama camp has wisely not leaked any VP choices so it is all speculation. Edwards has to be on the list, but I think him not endorsing Obama last week probably took him off the list. Edwards hedged his bets too long, IMO. I don't think he would be that great of a choice as he gets lost behind the fact that he is too rich for the poor to openly embrace and too pro-poor for the rich and middle class. He is also from a state too far north to be "really" southern and too far south to be northern. NC has 15 electoral votes and went red last time despite his presence on the ticket. A good presidential candidate for 2012 or 2016, but not a VP candidate today. Dem insiders seem to like Kathleen Sebelius to placate the Hillary supporters and deliver solid excutive experience in a hot name. That would be a solid ticket. She is very popular in 2004 red state Kansas and could deliver it, but that is only 6 electoral votes. I have seen her speak on TV and although she is solid and heartfelt, her stump speaking is nothing to write home about. She is a solid governor, but really made her name by kicking the insurance companies' asses. Gen. Wesley Clark has been a longtime favorite of mine who addresses a lot of Obama's weaknesses. As former head of NATO, Clark would give him a military, security, and foreign policy advisor (sorely needed) and a military, security, and foreign policy attack dog against McCain (if needed). Clark is very progressive, he is very smart, and his resume is clean. Clark has big time credibility in Europe and, with bridge-maker Obama, would instantly repair America's tattered international reputation. Former Marine Jim Webb would be a great choice for many of the same reasons. While Clark is a intellectual crowd guy, Webb is a hardnosed everyman. He is anti-iraq with a military background and is a straight and forceful talker. Webb just looks like he could break you in half. His speaking and debate skills are very plain, but top notch. Mainstream America gets him. He would be an excellent attack dog on the stumbling McCain. Frankly, if we lose, I could see Webb as the rising star for the Dems in 2012. He is a beast and Virginia has 13 electoral votes and went red last time. He could deliver virginia and maybe help deliver a few southern states. I haven't seen General Zinni speak, so I don't know if he is up to the VP job, but his resume sounds OK, not great. I really don't know if it helps to partner anti-war from the start Obama with a guy who was a loud proponent of us going in. There seems to be whispers that suggest Zinni is on the list. Janet Napolitano would be a VERY smart pick if the economy gets worse. She is a spendy liberal like Obama, but has been financially brilliant in Arizona at balancing the books without raising taxes and is someone who has her political and spending priorities straight. She is tough --- vetoing the Hell out of the Arizona republican led legislature. Additionally, she was Anita Hill's attourney. That sends the right kind of supreme court messages out that should really motivate the Hillary crowd. She is widely respected as one of the better governors and has a first hand take on the border issue. She is pretty damned salty as VP candidates go, IMO. Sadly, I don't know that she could swing Arizona's 10 electoral votes to Obama with McCain in the race. From an election standpoint there may be better candidates; From doing the VP job standpoint, she is up there with Clark. Joe Biden is a sharp tongued foreign Policy expert who I adore, but he does have a way of bungling campaigns by his love of his own voice. I doubt Biden could accidentally sink Obama if he screwed up--- Obama is too teflon. Biden seems to get along great with Obama and does strongly give off a presidential vibe in debates (not an insignificant point when people watch the VP debates to see if the VP seems competent). VP's often act as attack dogs on the opposing Presidential candidate. Biden would be a great weapon against the Republican candidate. He singlehandedly destroyed Rudy Guiliani. Biden is from a small state but does have his own fan base nationwide. Voters who know foreign policy know Biden, but he doesn't give the military bump with the security crowd that clark would and won't give you a red state like some of the others can. IMO the short list for Secretary of State should start with Joe Biden and end with Governor Richardson. NM Governor Richardson would be a very solid pick for VP. He has a well publicized and well respected resume. He is a great negotiator, but sadly an even bigger ego. He seems to read his press clippings and actually defended attourney general Gonzales on the grounds that he was hispanic too. That pandering lack of judgement might come into play turning off a lot of voters who would otherwise consider minority candidates. With Obama's aloofness, it could be risky adding an arrogant partner. I think a more individually approachable person would be good. In Richardson's favor, he would be one of the few VP candidates who could bring in extra votes that Obama would not get in big swing states Florida and Ohio. (Usually VPs don't generate many votes outside of their home state). This ticket would clean up the Hispanic vote. I think his best ticket in terms of electoral count may actually be Obama/frmr FL Gov. Bob Graham ticket. Obama will not win the red leaning older florida with a republican governor without a lot of help. Graham is one of the few candidates who could deliver Florida. Graham may not look it, but is very, very clever. If you listen to him speak for a while you really appreciate how smart and insightful he is. Graham never lost an election in Florida and is a fan of bipartisanship to accomplish bigger goals. He could definitely give Obama Florida and would give them a real chance to win several southern states with a black man/good ol' boy 1-2 punch. (I felt as silly writing that last sentence as you felt reading it, but it is nonetheless true.)
12. I think Jim Webb would be a better choice. A Senator from Southern State with military experience and a new face.