Home > Election Information > Election Knowledge Base > Snap Election now!!!?

Snap Election now!!!?

If there was an election today who would you vote for. At the expiry of the question the winning party would be nominated. vote for whatever party you like. The winning question would be down to my own personal stance. place your "X's" now please! spoilt votes don't count For the UK electorate only, sorry Hmm, I didn't quite literally mean X. come on give me the names of the party you unruly mob!!

Public Comments

  1. X
  2. xx b.n.p
  3. ELECTION IN NEW HAMSPHIRE WAS RIGGED IN CLINTON FAVORS This page is an evolving compilation of outstanding citizen investigation of the highly suspicious New Hampshire primary voting results. We are borrowing and synthesizing from many sources cited and credited here. Thursday 1/10: Bruce O'Dell writes: Theron Horton and I have confirmed that based on the official results on the New Hampshire Secretary of State web site, there is a remarkable relationship between Obama and Clinton votes, when you look at votes tabulated by op-scan versus votes tabulated by hand: Clinton Optical scan 91,717 52.95% Obama Optical scan 81,495 47.05% Clinton Hand-counted 20,889 47.05% Obama Hand-counted 23,509 52.95% The percentages appear to be swapped. This seems highly unusual. Recall that the specific model of Diebold op-scan [1.94w] and central tabulator in use in New Hampshire are proven by demonstration [Hursti Hack] to be vulnerable to insider manipulation. Theron Horton and I are proceeding with the intra-county and demographic analysis. More to come. Bruce O'Dell Co-Coordinator for Data Analysis Election Defense Alliance Bodell[at]ElectionDefenseAlliance[dot]org watch this people http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs and read this http://www.mediatakeout.com/20885/conspiracy_new_reports_suggest_that_hillary_may_have_actually_lost_the_new_hampshire_primary.html
  4. XXXX freedom, snp. anything but labour, not sure who they all seem inept
  5. there really isn't anyone I would vote for, can we vote against instead in order of strength of feeling against the awful options?? I think the USA has a much better choice at the moment!
  6. XXXXX ! Actually, your votes are private, that is why we have ballot boxes - how do we know that your'e not Mr.Bean looking for a cheap way of polling?
  7. I wouldn't vote. I believe that the people can govern themselves far better than any government can. Governments are unnecessary, almost always dangerous and prone to corruption. They often have their best interests at heart, not the interests of those they govern.
  8. LABOURRRRRRRRRR forever
  9. Hi redcoat in answer to your question yesterday why dont we give david cameron a chance heres my reasons as a party the tory party has never looked after the majority only the minority every tory goverment has left our nation in deep trouble whenever it has governed in the last 50 years.Your party is built on worn out old politics and your core is filled the lunatics like the people on here who change names to post propaganda and answer there own question in a way they wish to see using other names to look like other members. yes we know!!!!!!!!These people spread hatred do you think in a modern age this is really a party to govern again.Of course you do thats why you and your couple of pals keep writing these garbage questions poor show the lot of you.:) oh by the way labour anything to stop the lunatics being in charge of the asylum.
  10. Keep the BNP out.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers