Is Mitt Romney pro-war as long as neither of his five sons have to go?

Public Comments

  1. Now then, he didn't say that. He left the choice to them, they chose not to go.
  2. Yes. Those able-bodied Mittmen are the same pvssies the neocons spew about the dems that don't enlist. Which one is gay? ( I think the youngest one ).
  3. You have to ask? The so-called "defining struggle of our generation" according to one of Bush's speechwriters, er, I mean president Bush is apparently not important enough for the rich to fight. I guess that strategy solves two problems - they kill off Muslims while simultaneously ridding themselves of those damned poor people in America.
  4. You know this smugness gets old. Decent citizens just want their civil rights and freedoms intact,their borders secured and NO BIG BROTHER monitoring their every move and every thought and every word.And those citizens who do not are mentally ill,period.I mean what is with some of these people who actually want to lose their rights and their freedom and welcome BIG BROTHER to rule over them with an iron fist and brainwash them? They are NUTS! - Insane! - not well - CRAZY - MENTALLY ILL - sickos!!!!!!! The decent people in this country whether they vote Republican or Democrat better stand up to them before its too late.Because the freedom hating pro BIG BROTHER sickos cross party lines. too. By the way foreign policy supercedes your bias. If only those who VOLUNTEER for military service and their immediate families were allowed to support foreign policy decisions to go to war then there might not be enough support to do so when it really counts most.
  5. Leftest cheep shot! No one is "pro-war" dog. We do believe there are enemies of the U.S. besides you liberals.
  6. "neither of his five sons"??? Is that possible? LOL Okay, I know you didn't mean it. :) Volunteer military. Their choice.
  7. Of course he is, he's a republican. Their chickenhawk track record speaks for itself. Of course, he did let them choose for themselves. In my opinion, that's better than forcing them to join as a way to court the military vote.
  8. yup. Probably much like George W Bush is pro war as long as his daughters don't have to go.
  9. Heck, i thought all the Dem candiates think we should be making more war in Afdghanistan. So does that mean Hillary is urging Chelsea to enlist ? She sure didn't urge Chelsea to enlist to go to haiti, bosnia or kosavo. I don't remember any Gore kids enlisting for those either. But now I guess, Bidens, Obama's, Edwards and Hillarys kids will be lining up to enlist to go to afghanistan..right ???
  10. No one is pro war....They just fill the need to protect their Country. I don't know how old you have to be but the oldest is nearing 40 and the youngest is 26 and 29. I would say the youngest two could enlist. I think they want younger fit guys to fight. Even though they are young, but you don't know with today standards. Some people think 45 are old :/ I'm sure Mitt would be proud of his boys if they fought. He just gave them a choice to go or not.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers