Who is taking Mitt Romney seriously as a "moral" leader?

Dont the political "moral" crowd pride themselves on sticking to just one side of an issue? Romney flip-flops so much (gays, abortion, etc) I cant take a word of it seriously. Who can? And given that I believe the "moral" pandering of politicians will never be taken as seriously ever again.

Public Comments

1. Who???????????????????????????? Nah I'm not tking him very seriously either,,,,,more like a Bob Dole if you ask me!!! Too bad he dosen't repeat his name
2. It never should have been taken seriously in the first place, except as a reason to vote AGAINST candidates running on a "morality" platform. Bringing religion into government is a violation of the First Amendment.
3. They support him because they know they can control him. And they know they can't control Giuliani. I think they underestimated Giuliani and took their power in choosing the party's nominee for granted. Why they didn't line up behind someone earlier, like Brownback, Huckabee, Thompson, or even McCain, I don't know, but they're scrambling to get behind the strongest candidate who could beat Giuliani at this point because I guess they figure he has the strongest orginization to beat Giuliani for the nomination and they know that they can control Romney very easily.
4. No one I hope. The only time I've ever seen Romney appear sincere was when he said he was for gay rights and a woman's right to choose. There's an ad where he looks straight into the camera and says this in a very heartfelt way. I hope they play it a lot in Iowa and NH, no one should vote for Romney.
5. I am not fond of Romney. Giuliani, Thompson, and McCain are the front runners right now. SO I doubt he will get the nomination. Although i did like his remark in the debate last week "Its not that Liberals are ignorant, its what they know is wrong" ~ Mitt Romney But other than that he is a weak candidate.