Do you think this is fair or professional? Strawpoll08.com keeps removing Ron Paul from their polls.?

Here was their response when I sent them an email asking why I couldn't find Ron Paul on their poll: contact@strawpoll08.com wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:22:03 -0700 From: contact@strawpoll08.com Subject: RE: Where is Ron Paul in your list to vote for? "I have found that most of the polls like yours are very biased toward a certain candidate and therefore give the results based upon insufficient information because a choice was not offered." You must be on crack. Hope you have a good dealer. What you said above could only be said by a Ron Paul supporter! The rest of civilization sees a poll with over 140 candidates and 30 parties and they think, wow this site is trying to be fair to all. The rest of civilization sees a poll results page with different candidates winning and concludes that hey maybe this site isn't biased towards one candidate. I do have Paul on the poll. He's on the expanded poll. Have fun shootin your crack paultard.

Public Comments

1. That's hilarious! And so true. Thanks for sharing.
2. it doesnt matter..he has no reasonable chance of getting the nomination no matter how qualified he may be
3. I wonder how this anti-paulite thinks that you will "have fun shooting your crack" when crack is a water insoluble freebase. Maybe he is just against crack heads, or was it a Freudian slip? Was he secretly thinking about "having fun shooting" and just took it out in an anti-paulite manner? OK, just kidding, but that is really indicative of the general lack of manners that our society as a whole suffers under at this time in history. You know I went there and you are right, they do seem to have the poll--not really rigged--but stacked against certain parties and candidates, not just Ron Paul, but all of those that are "lesser thans" or "also rans"--according to the media. It is a shameless attempt to sway people into supporting a certain candidate or set of "winner" candidates. Subtle but definitely there.
4. The answer is extremely un-professional and shows disrespect to the point of slander. Which clearly shows a person that should be fired from his/her job. I'd suggest you follow up & get the smart a _ _ fired! ****************************************************
5. Who cares about the presidential election when crack can be made soluble with vinegar?
6. Sham site. He has results for polls, going back before his site was even created. Go here, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.strawpoll08.com Look at a couple of the links, you will see his site doesn't appear until between Apr 30 2007, and May 22 2007. Yet, if you look here, http://web.archive.org/web/20070509041819/www.strawpoll08.com/winners.htm He has "results" going way back into 2006. All information is likely suspect, the only one rigging polls is him. I think I've seen emails and comments back and forth between the admin there, and the one at 2008horserace.com (another sham poll, where the admin also hand edits the number of Paul votes, based on comments that are pro-ron paul after voting).
7. I think we have a very unhappy person here. Let's pray for him and see what happens.
8. May I have permission to use the word paultard on YA from now on? I LOVE IT!