Rudy Giuliani for President?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuOaTBsp_3lfn9uiVLxxHXPsy6IX?qid=20070519230851AAaVteg

Public Comments

  1. yes...yes...yes
  2. A pro-abortion neocon. I think not. Ron Paul 2008
  3. Yes... and not for his post-9/11 reputation, but for what he did for NYC prior to 9/11. Anyone who can make that city more "liveable" ... well... just imagine the good he can do to make this country more liveable! GO RUDY!!
  4. Nope. Are you kidding you would actually let that snake run the country. Ron Paul 2008: A true gentleman.
  5. I may well vote for him. My only concern is his personal baggage.
  6. RON PAUL.BRING BACK OUR LIBERTY.This is the man,that is going to fix this country.Not no Rudy Giuliani.This name is not even American.
  7. Why would ANYBODY vote for him???? 1. His firm has DIRECT links to Hugo Chavez (kinda Ironic for the "tough on terror guy") 2. he's a pro choice conservative (an oxymoron) 3. He's a pro gun control conservative (another oxymoron) 4. His Response to Rep. Paul in the debates showed absolute stupidity (he obviously didn't read the 911 report) 5. he had a horrible record BEFORE the attacks and all he did during the attacks was stand and look at some rubble. 6. he has no foreign policy experience but claims that he does because he watched a couple towers be destroyed by "foreigners" 7. he know little to nothing about the cause of 911 but claims that he does because that's his whole platform. He knows nothing about terrorism. 8. he has no national government experience 9. He wants to have a "tamper proof ID card" that Illegals "come and sign up for" riiiiiiight they're just going to come up and say "hi I'm here illegally" 10. He's a democrat Get serious people!
  8. No way. Rudy has flip-flopped all over the place on issues, and proved that he is not to be trusted. He is a bootlicker of the global elite, just like Bush. His attempts at capitalizing on 9/11 are sickening to say the least. He's also been caught in peculiar lies about 9/11. Most recently, he was caught lying about how the WTC7 collapsed. He said that it came down in "stages" over a period of time when it really fell at a free fall speed in under seven seconds flat! I could have told you that it came straight down in a matter of seconds, and I live in Arizona! But a guy who was the freakin' Mayor of NYC during the attacks thinks this building came down in stages?! Very strange! He's trying to rewrite history evidently.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers