John Edwards Affair Knowledge Base
What do you think about John Edwards affair? It seems like John Edward cheated on his wife, Hillary Clinton was cheated on by her husband, and John McCain cheated on his dying wife and dumped her for a 25 year old. Seems like Barack Obama is the only clean one so far. What are your thoughts?
Is the Hillary Clinton campaign team trying to smear John Edwards ? The newest Associated Press story about John Edwards says that the National Enquirer published a story regarding a possible extramarital affair .According to the tabloid story , John Edwards had an affair with a woman who worked on his campaign .John Edwards said that the story is unfounded .
Should John Edwards Divorce His Wife? The Republican Hero, Newt Gingrich, divorced his wife when he found out she had cancer. Should John Edwards follow his lead and server her divorce papers while she lies in her hospital bed and then have an affair to boot? Would this help him get the GOP vote?
Does it appear that John Edwards was correct about 200,000 vets being homeless? IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) - Nov 20, 2007 A homeless Vietnam veteran whose body was found beneath an Iowa City bridge had been turned away just days before from a Veterans Affairs center and the county jail. The nearly naked body of Sonny Iovino, 55, was found Nov. 7 under a bridge, and an autopsy showed he died of hypothermia. His body was found two days after Iovino had repeated run-ins with police. http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/index.cfm/page/article/id/8905 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS About one-third of the adult homeless population have served their country in the Armed Services. Current population estimates suggest that about 195,000 veterans (male and female) are homeless http://www1.va.gov/homeless/page.cfm?pg=1
What do you think of my ideal goverment for 2008? What do you think of my ideal goverment for 2008? here are a few: President: Condoleezza Rice Vice President: Jeb Bush Environmental Protection: Al Gore Homeland Security : Duncan Hunter Department of Defense: Rudi Giuliani Department of Education: Laura Bush Department of Justice: Hillary Clinton Department of Energy: John Edwards Drug Control Policy: Mike Huckabee Housing & Urban Development: Mitt Romney Veterans Affairs: John McCain I know there are more department jobs but I don't want to name them all.
Will Edwards having out of wedlock kids this year hurt his chances for winning the nomination? Presidential candidate John Edwards is caught up in a love child scandal, a blockbuster ENQUIRER investigation has discovered. The ENQUIRER has learned exclusively that Rielle Hunter, a woman linked to Edwards in a cheating scandal earlier this year, is more than six months pregnant — and she's told a close confidante that Edwards is the father of her baby! The ENQUIRER's political bombshell comes just weeks after Edwards emphatically denied having an affair with Rielle, who formerly worked on his campaign and told another close pal that she was romantically involved with the married ex-senator. http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_love_child/celebrity/64426
According to the Media, the candidates will say or do anything to get Votes, is this like a scam election? Last night on 20/20 they did a story about the candidates and how they use dirty tactics to get votes. Like calling voters pretending to be taking a poll then asking questions like "how satisfied are you with the fact that john edwards had an affair?" (not exact question but neg. things like that) And they are using stradegy to gain votes-like making promises to change things, when in fact they can't change much without congressional approval. Is this like mass psychology to scam the voters? Stealth-the thing with john edwards having an affair was just an example, he did not have an affair that I know of, But, you are proof of how easily people are persuaded by lies.
Who would you select as VP for either Obama or Clinton? I think Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, would make a perfect VP. He has had the foreign affairs experience that both the Presidential hopefuls are lacking. I'd also like to see Senator Joe Biden offered the Secretary of State job and Secretary of Defense go to John Edwards. There...that would get us back on the right track! Yes? No? ADD: Just get home from school, kids?
Why a lot of people ask for blind justice in P.Hilton case, and know for DELGADILLO case very few ask for it . This case if worst............ more details? : While the Duke Non-Rape, Non-Kidnapping, and Non-Sexual Assault Case has resulted in the ouster of the miscreant Michael B. Nifong from his prosecutorial office in Durham, North Carolina, on the other side of the country it seems that the spirit of Nifongism lives on. Furthermore, if justice truly is going to be served – and this Nifong case has placed prosecutors on notice – then either a prosecutor or his wife is going to have to share a cell with the recently-jailed Paris Hilton. Now, even with The Nifong Show playing at full tilt in North Carolina, nothing has captured the public’s attention more than the Paris Hilton affair in Los Angeles. Yes, please spare me the "she broke the law and must pay the consequences" nonsense. I suspect that had her name been Paris Jones, she would have spent almost no time in jail, and perhaps none at all. However, since she was driving with a revoked license, perhaps Ms. Hilton might want to change her name to Michelle Delgadillo, the wife of the prosecutor who went after Hilton, Rocky Delgadillo. It seems that Ms. Delgadillo has a similar driving record to the errant Paris, and I can say with certainty that I would not want to be a passenger in an automobile that either of them are driving – if I value my life. In a recent news account, we have learned the following: City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo got Paris Hilton jailed for violating probation for driving with a suspended license, then condemned her early release. Now, he says he's embarrassed about the outstanding bench warrant for his wife, Michelle, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday. Rocky Delgadillo said he didn't know about it until this week and has urged his wife to remedy the situation. "My wife is embarrassed about this, and I am embarrassed as well," he said. The couple also has been chronically late in paying fines for at least five parking tickets in the last three years, the newspaper reported. One violation for parking in a red zone in December 2006 was not paid until the newspaper inquired about the tickets last month, by which time the $70 infraction had become a $174 fine with penalties. However, as they say on late-night TV, "Wait, there’s more!" On Monday, Delgadillo apologized for keeping quiet about a 2004 accident in which his wife crashed his city-issued vehicle while driving on a suspended license. Delgadillo said he was reimbursing the city for the $1,222 repair. The prosecutor has said Michelle Delgadillo's offenses are not comparable to those of Hilton, who is serving a 45-day sentence for violating her probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case. In the latest disclosure, Michelle Delgadillo said she was "very embarrassed" and was working to resolve the arrest warrant issue as soon as possible. "I will do whatever the court instructs me to do. I apologize for any embarrassment this has caused my husband and family," she said in a statement to the newspaper. One can be sure that Ms. Delgadillo is not going to have to worry about spending several weeks in a cell or having to be humiliated in front of a judge. After all, she is not Paris Hilton, and in this land of Two Americas, anyone who might have been born with a silver or even gold spoon by definition is an Enemy of the People. Thus, even though it is clear that Hilton’s blue Bentley was targeted by police and that she was treated much more harshly than is the situation with most people, anything less than having her hanged, drawn, and quartered for driving without a driver’s license is not good enough. Yes, Paris Hilton no doubt is not someone I would want one of my sons to marry, nor do I admire people who make porn videos of themselves having graphic sex. But that is beside the point here. Paris Hilton does not operate in my universe, nor is she someone who generally is going to occupy space in my head. The issue, however, is not Paris Hilton nor her sex life, nor even her driving record. The issue is this: Her case proves to me that mob justice rules in the United States of America. Furthermore, it also demonstrates to me that prosecutors generally get a free pass when it comes to breaking the law. Yes, that is a bold statement to make after spending a week watching Michael Nifong making very public trips to the woodshed and being disbarred and unceremoniously kicked out of his office. However, Nifong is just one prosecutor, and it took millions of dollars (tax dollars, I must add) and a Herculean effort on behalf of a number of people just to deal with his obvious lawbreaking. Furthermore, Nifong only has lost his law license and his job. He has not lost his freedom, despite lying to judges, withholding evidence, committing perjury, suborning perjury, engaging in obstruction of justice, and the like. In fact, there currently are no criminal investigations that are going on, despite the fact that he was an in-your-face lawbreaker, and someone whose crimes did not involve peacefully driving a luxury car, but rather attempting to subvert the system of justice and knowingly send three innocent people to prison for 30 years. Compare the troubles of Paris Hilton to those of Nifong and ask yourself who is the greater lawbreaker. For that matter, compare Paris Hilton to Michelle Delgadillo and ask yourself who has been more flagrant in breaking the law. Yet, Nifong collects a state pension, Delgadillo makes excuses, and Hilton sits in jail. Of course, there was the public outcry when she first was let out of jail after four days and given house arrest. Never mind that there were good reasons for doing so. (It seems that Ms. Hilton realized that because any guard – male or female – could look into her cell through a window, a guard also could take pictures of her sitting on the toilet and then sell the pictures to the tabloids for thousands of dollars. Now, I doubt anyone would want to take pictures of me on the john – or even Nifong, for that matter – but someone like Hilton is a different story.) Thus, it is time to allude to my title. Yes, there are Two Americas, but not the two of which the pathetic John Edwards speaks. (He lives in a $5 million house – while criticizing others who are wealthy, so that is all we need to know about him.) No, there truly are Two Americas, the one of government employees and politicians who are protected even while engaging in the worst kind of lawbreaking, and the other being the America in which the rest of us live. Now, I really could not care less if Paris Hilton is driving her blue Bentley around Beverly Hills when the government says she cannot do so. However, I do care when prosecutors’ wives are permitted to flaunt the law and receive a free pass, and when prosecutors themselves can commit felony after felony and be treated as though they are "protecting" the people. The state of affairs to which Edwards points is imaginary, in my opinion. But the Two Americas to which I point is very real. The Delgadillo example is small, but nonetheless telling. I can assure you that Michelle Delgadillo is not going to have to worry about a male guard leering at her while she is sitting on a toilet.
Blind Justice ? The wife of the prosecutor of Paris Hilton, now in a very very similar case? but..no jail....? While the Duke Non-Rape, Non-Kidnapping, and Non-Sexual Assault Case has resulted in the ouster of the miscreant Michael B. Nifong from his prosecutorial office in Durham, North Carolina, on the other side of the country it seems that the spirit of Nifongism lives on. Furthermore, if justice truly is going to be served – and this Nifong case has placed prosecutors on notice – then either a prosecutor or his wife is going to have to share a cell with the recently-jailed Paris Hilton. Now, even with The Nifong Show playing at full tilt in North Carolina, nothing has captured the public’s attention more than the Paris Hilton affair in Los Angeles. Yes, please spare me the "she broke the law and must pay the consequences" nonsense. I suspect that had her name been Paris Jones, she would have spent almost no time in jail, and perhaps none at all. However, since she was driving with a revoked license, perhaps Ms. Hilton might want to change her name to Michelle Delgadillo, the wife of the prosecutor who went after Hilton, Rocky Delgadillo. It seems that Ms. Delgadillo has a similar driving record to the errant Paris, and I can say with certainty that I would not want to be a passenger in an automobile that either of them are driving – if I value my life. In a recent news account, we have learned the following: City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo got Paris Hilton jailed for violating probation for driving with a suspended license, then condemned her early release. Now, he says he's embarrassed about the outstanding bench warrant for his wife, Michelle, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday. Rocky Delgadillo said he didn't know about it until this week and has urged his wife to remedy the situation. "My wife is embarrassed about this, and I am embarrassed as well," he said. The couple also has been chronically late in paying fines for at least five parking tickets in the last three years, the newspaper reported. One violation for parking in a red zone in December 2006 was not paid until the newspaper inquired about the tickets last month, by which time the $70 infraction had become a $174 fine with penalties. However, as they say on late-night TV, "Wait, there’s more!" On Monday, Delgadillo apologized for keeping quiet about a 2004 accident in which his wife crashed his city-issued vehicle while driving on a suspended license. Delgadillo said he was reimbursing the city for the $1,222 repair. The prosecutor has said Michelle Delgadillo's offenses are not comparable to those of Hilton, who is serving a 45-day sentence for violating her probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case. In the latest disclosure, Michelle Delgadillo said she was "very embarrassed" and was working to resolve the arrest warrant issue as soon as possible. "I will do whatever the court instructs me to do. I apologize for any embarrassment this has caused my husband and family," she said in a statement to the newspaper. One can be sure that Ms. Delgadillo is not going to have to worry about spending several weeks in a cell or having to be humiliated in front of a judge. After all, she is not Paris Hilton, and in this land of Two Americas, anyone who might have been born with a silver or even gold spoon by definition is an Enemy of the People. Thus, even though it is clear that Hilton’s blue Bentley was targeted by police and that she was treated much more harshly than is the situation with most people, anything less than having her hanged, drawn, and quartered for driving without a driver’s license is not good enough. Yes, Paris Hilton no doubt is not someone I would want one of my sons to marry, nor do I admire people who make porn videos of themselves having graphic sex. But that is beside the point here. Paris Hilton does not operate in my universe, nor is she someone who generally is going to occupy space in my head. The issue, however, is not Paris Hilton nor her sex life, nor even her driving record. The issue is this: Her case proves to me that mob justice rules in the United States of America. Furthermore, it also demonstrates to me that prosecutors generally get a free pass when it comes to breaking the law. Yes, that is a bold statement to make after spending a week watching Michael Nifong making very public trips to the woodshed and being disbarred and unceremoniously kicked out of his office. However, Nifong is just one prosecutor, and it took millions of dollars (tax dollars, I must add) and a Herculean effort on behalf of a number of people just to deal with his obvious lawbreaking. Furthermore, Nifong only has lost his law license and his job. He has not lost his freedom, despite lying to judges, withholding evidence, committing perjury, suborning perjury, engaging in obstruction of justice, and the like. In fact, there currently are no criminal investigations that are going on, despite the fact that he was an in-your-face lawbreaker, and someone whose crimes did not involve peacefully driving a luxury car, but rather attempting to subvert the system of justice and knowingly send three innocent people to prison for 30 years. Compare the troubles of Paris Hilton to those of Nifong and ask yourself who is the greater lawbreaker. For that matter, compare Paris Hilton to Michelle Delgadillo and ask yourself who has been more flagrant in breaking the law. Yet, Nifong collects a state pension, Delgadillo makes excuses, and Hilton sits in jail. Of course, there was the public outcry when she first was let out of jail after four days and given house arrest. Never mind that there were good reasons for doing so. (It seems that Ms. Hilton realized that because any guard – male or female – could look into her cell through a window, a guard also could take pictures of her sitting on the toilet and then sell the pictures to the tabloids for thousands of dollars. Now, I doubt anyone would want to take pictures of me on the john – or even Nifong, for that matter – but someone like Hilton is a different story.) Thus, it is time to allude to my title. Yes, there are Two Americas, but not the two of which the pathetic John Edwards speaks. (He lives in a $5 million house – while criticizing others who are wealthy, so that is all we need to know about him.) No, there truly are Two Americas, the one of government employees and politicians who are protected even while engaging in the worst kind of lawbreaking, and the other being the America in which the rest of us live. Now, I really could not care less if Paris Hilton is driving her blue Bentley around Beverly Hills when the government says she cannot do so. However, I do care when prosecutors’ wives are permitted to flaunt the law and receive a free pass, and when prosecutors themselves can commit felony after felony and be treated as though they are "protecting" the people. The state of affairs to which Edwards points is imaginary, in my opinion. But the Two Americas to which I point is very real. The Delgadillo example is small, but nonetheless telling. I can assure you that Michelle Delgadillo is not going to have to worry about a male guard leering at her while she is sitting on a toilet. June 22, 2007 William L. Anderson, Ph.D.
What will be the next Democratic scandal to break? ??? 1. Hillary Clinton had decade- long affair wih Madeline Albright ( no mental picture required) 2. John Edwards looses toupee while admitting his ancestors were slave-owners 3. Barack Obama reveals being Caucasian up until 2000 4. Dennis Kucinich admits having love-child with Mary Matalin 5. Bill Richardson reveals he is mono-lingual 6. John Kerrey admits being a cross-dresser (no picture here either) 7. Alan Colmes reveals that he is actually handsome AND conservative, but pretends to be liberal to 'make the big bucks' 8. Al Gore exposed hunting spotted owl in Argentina 9. Al Franken admits he was never funny on SNL Source: Joe Biden
KAMAL KARNA ROY, U S BORN IN GUAM (u s territory .no much oriental indian blood; do u know? if no it is okay. Hello robin1231hotmailcom Change Preferences | Sign Out Sign In | Register Now Print Edition | Subscribe | PostPoints NewsNation Investigations Education Photos & Video World Technology KidsPost Discussions Metro Entertainment Religion Corrections Business Health Post Magazine Archives PoliticsPolitics Blogs House/Senate Votes White House Congress 2008 Campaign In Depth Polls In the Loop DC | MD | VA OpinionsOpinions Home Toles Cartoons On Faith Blogs Telnaes Animations PostGlobal Feedback Outlook Discussion Groups LocalMetro News Weather Local Explorer Jobs Education Traffic Community Guides Cars DC | MD | VACrime The Extras Real Estate Columns/Blogs Obituaries Local Business Yellow Pages SportsRedskins D.C. United Columns/Blogs NFL Nationals Capitals College Basketball NHL Wizards High Schools Local Colleges NBA Arts & LivingStyle Movies Travel Fashion & Beauty Horoscopes Smart Living Television Books Home & Garden Comics Entertainment News Food & Dining Museums Theater & Dance Crosswords City GuideFind Restaurants Find Local Events Find Movies Visitors Guide Find Bars & Clubs Going Out Gurus JobsSearch JobsCarsBuy a Car Sell a Car Experts & Advice Dealer Specials Coupons Real EstateBuy a Home Sell a Home Property Values RentalsFind a Rental Rent Your Place ShoppingShop New Deals & Discounts Shopper Blog Shop Used Sell Your Stuff Pets SEARCH: washingtonpost.com Web | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > ColumnsYour Comments On... Shot and a Chablis I have a couple of problems with Clinton's seeming-is-being theory of campaigning. - By Eugene Robinson Commentsrobin1231hotmailcom wrote: Yahoo!My Yahoo!Mail Make Y! your home pageYahoo! SearchSearch:Welcome, nidhu1231 [Sign Out, My Account]Answers Home -Forum -Blog -Help Ask Answer Discover Search for questions: Advanced My Profile Home /> Politics & Government > Other - Politics & Government > Open Question Bogart PHD Member since: January 14, 2008 Total points: 6268 (Level 5) Badge Image: Contributing In: Elections Add to My Contacts Block User Open QuestionShow me another » How does Obama intend on uniting Americans when he keeps insulting them? 18 minutes ago - 3 days left to answer. Report It 2 stars - mark this as Interesting! Who found this interesting? ghost Typical Cracka Email Save Add to private Watchlist Save to My Web Add to My Yahoo! Add to Del.icio.us RSS Answers (4) Show: All Answers Oldest to Newest Newest to Oldest Rated Highest to Lowest by harry k Member since: October 27, 2007 Total points: 11866 (Level 6) Badge Image: Contributing In: New York City Other - United States Add to My Contacts Block User By united America against him. 14 minutes ago 1 Rating: Good Answer 0 Rating: Bad Answer Report It Sorry, you must be Level 2 to rate by Typical Cracka Member since: April 02, 2008 Total points: 115 (Level 1) Add to My Contacts Block User Most Americans are uniting against him. 11 minutes ago 1 Rating: Good Answer 0 Rating: Bad Answer Report It Sorry, you must be Level 2 to rate by ghost Member since: May 23, 2007 Total points: 8515 (Level 5) Add to My Contacts Block User Quiet the tangent huh homie? 10 minutes ago 0 Rating: Good Answer 0 Rating: Bad Answer Report It Sorry, you must be Level 2 to rate by Nidhu G Member since: March 23, 2008 Total points: 24 (Level 1) oBAMA USES HIS STYLE TO EMBRACE WE THE PEOPLE. bUT HIS INTENT IS CLEAR TO BE U S PRESIDENT. hIS CHANCES OF GETTING ELECTED IS ZERO TO 0. REASONS ARE USA IS NOT READY TO ACCEPT A FULL BALACK OR HALF BLACK AS A LEADER AS BIG AS PRESIDENT, ESPEIALLY HE IS PARTLY DIRTY FOR SCANDALS, HE WAS INVOLVED : Read the Full Post Advertisement Featured Permalink: http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/theruckus... Sphere It! Digg It! Newsvine Del.icio.us Facebook Type SizePrint Email RSS Social Networks Permalink: http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/theruckus... TrackBack URL: http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/theruckus... Sphere It! Digg It! Newsvine Del.icio.us Facebook Thanks for sharing your feedback! If your feedback doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take a few minutes to publish - or longer if the blogger is moderating comments. DiscussEnter Your CommentSubmit Member Comments Posted By: CANDIDATE_REPUBLICAN (April 15, 2008 at 12:13 ) 4.15. 2008 new york the reverend hon'ble ms Gargi R Lahiri R N Tagore rd, Krishna Nagar, nadia, West Bengal, India: 107A Scribner Avenue, staten island new york 10301, usa. Deputy chief campaign in USA and International: The rev dr kamal karna roy as the candidate of U S President and demanding to be lawful nominee of GOP at the next GOP nominating convention against john McCain U S Senator, an allegedly orrupt leader who was allegedly involved in Paxson_ 40 some yrs old female Beauty as lobbyist for sale of passion for gain for business of paxson_ paxson business in interst pedalling crime against usa for pursu9t of sex pleasure of female companionships on repeated occasioons with free use of luxury aircraft and writing atleast 2 sweetheart custom made letter to u s communication dept , which we the people in U S Aconsider u sa is on sale in USAfor steering priate business.Now the problem is to find out if mcCain deserves to go to the White House to be Leader of UISA to enhance influence pedalling business or we the people show mcCain a short visit to jail house for a crime puruant to u S federal laws. we the people are in deep and complecated puzzle to solve: the F B I needs to help we the people to resolve the issue quickly. the rev dr kamal roy filed petition in the u s district courts to court an enquiry by appointment of a special Prosecutor to be appointed by U S Attorney General to find the truthj of corruption at highest level of govt in usa and mcCain as sitting U S Senator of GOP is surely highj enough govt official to be investigted by Special presecutor under laws. Click here to join the NEWSWEEK community, post comments and subscribe to our e-mail newsletters User Name:Password: Forgot password? News Politics Tech and Business Culture Health Voices Quick Guide Periscope National News International Next 2008 Iraq War Issues 2008 Against the Odds Video Top Story Archbishop Wuerl on Pope Benedict's Visit My Journey to the Top Latest News Pa. voters divided over Obama remarks PAKISTAN Elections Usher in a New Face By Zahid Hussain, Ron Moreau and Michael Hirsh | NEWSWEEK Mar 3, 2008 Issue « Return to Article Discuss Comments: Enter Your Comment Posted By: CANDIDATE_REPUBLICAN @ 04/14/2008 6:34:21 PM Comment: the reverend mother mrs tapasi b chakravorty democratic reormsa agent for candidate dr roy as opinion expressed by him recently: Ron Paul Mitt Romney Tom Tancredo Fred Thompson Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Chris Dodd John Edwards Mike Gravel Dennis Kucinich Posted By: CANDIDATE_REPUBLICAN @ 04/14/2008 11:38:50 AM Comment: Posted By: CANDIDATE_REPUBLICAN @ 04/13/2008 7:31:47 PM Comment: the cleanest contender of republican politicking against john mcCain another dop candidate who who accused of influence pedalling with sex related sweet_heart companionship of a middle aged beaty ( women are presumed to be always a beauty in a male dominated society since early civilization with anlican civilization or with hindu eras of lord krishna, a lover_boy in role ofa god or lord Brahma who used sex for pleasure in every vibrant moment of his un_dying body for ever and ever and possibly the god_emblem of hunduism inflicted john mcCain type symbol of pursuit of pleasure with male_female companionship in democratic conditions at coutries beyond borders. But mccain has not authorise by laws of we the people of usa pursuant u s consttuttion to extra use of female beauty as of choice of mccainian leadership and for mccain_paxson busijess_ female 40=, now 47= female beauty triangle , mccain deserved scrutiny by law enforcemet officil and f bi to determine if he could be indicted in court of laws for violations with crossing intterstate boders for pleasure of sexual pursuit for interest pdalling with issuance of atleast 2 sweet_heart letter to federara communication dept to wronglt exepeditegovt action before scrutiny. FB I must eaxamine complaint of grievance forwarded to for lawful inquest of mccain scandal with sex as mccain may be a human_god of some power but he is no, even a small god of any faith in the globe as such he is subject to criminal prosecution . when a gary hart se affair could result his exit from power, and elliot spitzer sex did exit his eclipse from power of new york governorship, only play_boy, part_timerbut moderatly good william jefferson clinton was as immune as a hindu or other dominion GOD to clebrate sexual pursuit in office of president along with historical evidence of genefer flower roman/sexbut you have to have a clintonian woman t o fill in conjugal partnership in life. the matter of comment on democratic corruption in power politics are of the rev dr kamal karna roy . a candidate of u s president , and the opinion repackaged by assistant campaign official with his consent. dr roy emphasized that in national interest for stability the democratic process may not be ideal in every situation, and presidents pervez mussaref presidency at the current tenure may not have to be short circuited by the current elected leader of democracy in power to derail important tenure of rocky freedom in democratic nation with intent of compromise with president musareff anf current democracy army in pakistan political system. pakistan should allow an optimally acceptable situation ti exit musarref , as this may allow new coalition in ruling parties to control national situation which , we the people at large beyond border of pakistan may consider to be wise condsidering Posted By: CANDIDATE_REPUBLICAN @ 04/01/2008 10:06:39 AM
Obama has no experience? Weigh in!? Obama has no experience? Weigh in!? I just want you guys to weigh in about why you think Obama doesn't have enough experience? This is what I think: You experience talkers are funny! Bush had tons of experience, so did Rumsfeld and Chenney. Bush also had a relative in the white house at one point in time, and he was governor of Texas, and he still fucked up! The only experience established politicians in America have is protecting special interest groups and screwing over the American people! Some of the best presidents of this country had very little experience aka JFK, Ronald Reagan, and Abraham Lincoln .He has ten years experience in public office, more than the two other Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton (six-plus years as Senator from New York) and John Edwards (six years as Senator from North Carolina). Barack's first eight years spent in the Illinois senate before his two years (and counting) of service in the U.S. Senate, should not be forgotten. Obama has served in the Illinois state senate, the united states senate, the foreign relations committee, &the Veteran's affair committee. That's more than enough experience. Damn! smartert.. , don't get your panties all in a twist. Since you seem to think being governor of California is enough experience to be president. Would you vote for Governor Schwarzenegger, who also an actor like Reagan had little to no experience before entering office, and alot less than Obama has :P No one's trying to change your minds about anything, I'm trying to correct when you come out with nonsense bullshit (damn Hillary supporters are about as cold and ornery as she is). Admitting he has the necessary experience does not mean you have to vote for him.
new hampshire primary: How Do you feel? Analysis: Obama now a prime target By BETH FOUHY, MANCHESTER, N.H. - Democrats who spent a year playing "Iowa Nice" might be taking a turn into New Hampshire nasty. Sen. Barack Obama's message of hope and unity was a fine fit for Iowa, a state where voters are notoriously resistant to negative campaigning, and the Democratic contest he won there was a relatively civil affair. Not a single televised attack ad was shown and the contenders exchanged only mild jabs. Such pleasantries will surely be jettisoned in New Hampshire by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who only has five days to rebound from a crippling loss in Iowa in order to prevent her candidacy from imploding; and by John Edwards, who placed slightly ahead of Clinton in Iowa and has shown his willingness to take a scalpel to his opponents when necessary. Obama has gone into this state's compressed contest with a target on his back — a situation he has managed to avoid throughout his career in politics. "We don't need more heat — we need more light," he said Friday, as if anticipating the sharper tone to come. But he's under the klieg lights now. "Obama, through an unprecedented convergence of luck and skill, has never before faced serious attack delivered by a competent opponent," Democratic strategist Dan Newman said. "He's now earned the right to be mercilessly scrubbed and scrutinized. No one knows how he'll respond to the challenge, and how voters will evaluate the criticism." Clinton said Friday that voters deserve a close examination of Obama's positions and the contrasts among candidates. "I think everybody is supposed to be vetted and tested," she said. "The last thing Democrats need is to move quickly through this process, so telescoped, without taking a hard look at all of this. ... It's hard to know exactly where he stands and people need to ask that." She added: "I think there's a lot "I think there's a lot to talk about, comparing and contrasting." Clinton, whose once sturdy lead in New Hampshire had already begun to shrink in the days before Iowa's caucuses, is relying on the state as her husband did in 1992 to make her the "comeback kid." The former president is still widely popular here and will campaign for his wife until the primary on Tuesday. "New Hampshire is the last chance for someone who loses Iowa," said Andrew Smith, polling director for the University of New Hampshire. "You lose in Iowa and you lose New Hampshire, it's done. You go home." Clinton's aides say her campaign will renew its scrutiny of Obama's comparatively thin record and lack of foreign policy experience, questioning whether he is ready to lead in a dangerous world. They will also try to paint him as something of a phony — someone whose lofty rhetoric isn't born out in his own public record. They point to his votes in the Senate to fund the Iraq war even as he tried to position himself as the strongest anti-war candidate in the field. "He talks about change but has no real record of making change," said Mark Penn, the Clinton campaign's pollster and senior strategist. The Clinton campaign is also likely to begin showing commercials attacking Obama's health care plan, which they say would leave 15 million people uninsured. Edwards, meanwhile, can be expected to renew questions about whether Obama's brand of unity politics is too naive for the dog-eat-dog world of partisan Washington. Much will also be riding on a nationally televised debate among the Democratic contenders Saturday. Both Clinton and Edwards have typically excelled in such forums, while Obama's performances have been inconsistent. "The debate will loom large," said Dante Scala, a political scientist at the University of New Hampshire. NUMBness is what got us in this awful mess in the first place. We shoulda gone with MickeyMouse Last time around. I keep thinking, Hilary has the experience we need , and now with Mr Obama leading the pack i think it's about time to inspect his background a little more closely. they did it to Hilary ,and she came out clean. Barack's turn. I just want to BEST one in there - if bringing up the past and proir shortcoming is how we do it ,so be it. you can't just listen to what they tell you. you have to find out the truth for yourself. Who are you rooting for in NEw Hampshire? if you are from nh and answer ,please let me know your from there , and if you'll be voting and for whom. I know it's a LOT to ask, but i just can't stand the suspense!! Mele Kai (i hope i spelled that right ), Links to articles Please? I like Links . by the way i do NOT thumb ppl down. i prefer to have you share your opinion in a positive way ,by thumbing up the ppl you agree with . (or if you enjoyed their sense of humor ,and how they Lightened things up a bit. ) and on that notePlease Don't REPORT ppl for me. i feel reporters are 'part of our Y!A problems' . you wouldn't be doing me any favors. Be Part of the SOLUTION. Just Say NO to THUMBS downers. Negativity Sucks.
What Liberal anti-military traitor said this? "Even the highest morale is eventually undermined by back-to-back deployments ... by shortages of spare parts and equipment, and by rapidly declining readiness." "We will not be permanent peacekeepers, dividing warring parties. This is not our strength or our calling." Was it John Kerry? John Edwards? Barack Obama? NO. Here's a clue: It's the same guy who said we should have a "humble foreign policy" that didn't "tell other nations how to run their affairs", and who eschewed "Nation Building". Give up? It was GEORGE W. BUSH! Part of his 2000 campaign. The first quotes were from a speech he gave at the Citadel in 1999. So, Bush worshippers, was he lying or badly misguided? Pick one!
"Rural Americans For Hillary".....? Honestly, here is the article...what are your opinions on this? So later this month, according to THIS INVITATION, the presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, is holding a "Rural Americans for Hillary" lunch and campaign briefing at the end of this month…. ..but she's holding it in Washington, DC…. …at a lobbying firm… … and specifically, though it's not mentioned in the invitation, at the lobbying firm Troutman Sanders Public Affairs… …which just so happens to lobby for the controversial multinational agri-biotech Monsanto. You read that right: Monsanto, about which there are serious questions about its culpability regarding 56 Superfund Sites, wanton and "outrageous" pollution, and the decidedly unkosher (and quite metaphoric) genetically-bred "Superpig." …A company that the website "Ethical Investing" labels "the world's most unethical and harmful investment." Holding an agri-summit in the plush halls of the lobbyists for Monsanto doesn't sound like the kind of "rural Americans" a presidential candidate would necessarily want to be photographed with. Particularly if Clinton's two primary opponents -- former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. -- don't take money from lobbyists and are trying to depict the frontrunner as too much a part of the corrupt Washington system, lobbyists, corporate America, et al…. But then again, it doesn't say Clinton will attend this luncheon -- just senior staffers and congressional endorsers! (Is that better or worse?) Response from the Clinton campaign to come…. Source: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2007/10/yee-haw.html#comments It really makes me laugh...I mean rural Americans are not that stupid...I suppose since the word rural is there she must think we are though.....lol....
Is Obama Someone We can Trust with Diplomacy and Complex Foreign Affairs? Senator Dodd of Connecticut offered the most stinging criticism, singling out Mr. Obama's comments on Pakistan. "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this morning," Mr. Dodd said in a statement. "But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power." Mr. Dodd said that while he would move against Osama bin Laden and other terrorists, he would not "declare my intentions for specific military action to the media in the context of a political campaign." The campaign of Senator Biden of Delaware sent out a statement to "congratulate" Mr. Obama on his "Johnny-come-lately" position, citing a long-standing push by Mr. Biden for more troops and reconstruction aid to Afghanistan and for more cooperation from Pakistan in the war on terrorism. But Mr. Biden, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also chastised Mr. Obama for being too specific. "The last thing you want to do is telegraph to the folks in Pakistan that we are about to violate their sovereignty," he said in an appearance at the National Press Club, according to his campaign. John Edwards of North Carolina and Governor Richardson of New Mexico did not criticize Mr. Obama directly, but issued statements saying that while they would use military force to fight terrorism, their focus would be on diplomacy first.
Creationists? Scietists have said we have never written a peer reviewed paper, or been in a sciene journal... That's because the world won't let us. *Question* Does this make you feel all warm and cozy inside? Om, I know what you are saying but that was not the point, the point was that we are not all dumb as you think we are. This is not the complete list.
PLEASE HELP WITH HISTORY HOME WORK! ITS A LIST OF PEOPLE AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE! any help would be appreciated I need the significanced of these places/peoples/events PLEASE HELP IF YOU CAN! THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH! Jamestown 1607- house of burgesses, 1619- massachusetts founded- john peter zenger trial, 1735- proclimation of 1763- treaty of alliance 1778- second continental congress 1775- roger williams- jonathan edwards- writs of assistance middle passage- judiciary act 1789- first bank of the united states 1791- proclamation of nuetrality- pinckneys treaty- washingtons's farewell address- XYZ affair- Jefferson's embargo- battle of tippacanoe- hartford convention- treaty of ghent- battle of new orleans- the american system- era of good feelings- Adams onis treaty- monroe doctrine- james monroe- john jay- excise tax- henry clay- edmond genet- impressment- PLEASE HELP ANY WAY YOU CAN!!!!
Why does Obama lie about his campaign contributions? "The junior Senator from Illinois denounces the corrosive influence of private political cash on U.S. democracy while cozying up to Chicago's notoriously corrupt Big Money Mayor Richard M. Daley (with whom he shares the same high-priced campaign consultant (David Axlerod) and raking in campaign largesse from wealthy world-capitalist interests. His top career sponsors include Goldman Sachs, Exelon (the world's leading nuclear plant operator), the Soros Fund Management, J.P Morgan Chase & Co., leading corporate law and lobbying firms (Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden, Arps, Sidley Austin LLP and others), top Chicago investment interests (including Henry Crown & Co and Aerial Capital Management) and the like. Obama's reliance on such deep-pockets supporters helps explain why he voted for a business-driven "tort reform" bill that rolled back working peoples' ability to obtain reasonable redress and compensation from misbehaving corporations. It is certainly part of why he opposed an amendment to the Bankruptcy Act that would have capped credit card interest rates at 30 percent. It is undoubtedly related to his vote against a bill that would have killed an amendment to the 2005 energy bill that Taxpayers for Common Sense and Citizens Against Government Waste called "one of the worst provisions in this massive piece of legislation." Under the amendment, which passed with Obama's help, U.S. taxpayers are providing millions of dollars in loan guarantees to power plant operators. They "risk losing billions of dollars if the companies default," as Ken Silverstein wrote in the November, 2006 issue of Harper's Magazine ("Barack Obama Inc.: The Birth of a Washington Machine"). Special interest influence is certainly behind Obama's constant plugging of federally subsidized ethanol ("E-85") as an environmentally friendly "alternative fuel." Reliance on corporate cash and power is also likely related to Obama's opposition to the introduction of single-payer national health insurance on the curious grounds that such a welcome social-democratic change would lead to employment difficulties for workers in the private insurance industry and that "voluntary" solutions are "more consonant" with "the American character" than "government mandates." The latter judgment is advanced despite the fact that a large U.S. majority supports government-mandated universal health insurance. Obama, it is worth noting, received $708,000 from medical and insurance interests between 2001 and 2006, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. His wife Michelle, a fellow Harvard Law graduate, is a Vice President for Community and External Affairs at the University of Chicago Hospitals, a position that paid her $273, 618 in 2006. For what it's worth, she also received $51,200 for attending a few board meetings of TreeHouse Foods, a giant firm where she was made a director after Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate. One day after Obama denounced Big Money control of U.S. politics in Iowa City, Iowa, the Los Angeles Times reported that Obama "raised more than $1 million in the first three months of his presidential campaign from law firms and companies that have major lobbying operations in the nation's capital." Obama has also received a combined $170,000 so far this year from financial giants Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, who together spent $4.6 million on federal lobbying in 2006. "Obama received more than two-thirds (68 percent) of his first quarter 2007 fundraising total ‘from donations of $1000 or more.'" The Los Angeles Times also reported that Obama received more than two-thirds (68 percent) of his first quarter 2007 fundraising total "from donations of $1000 or more." Obama has "played up populist themes of [campaign finance] reform," trumpeting his "large number of small donations" and claiming (in the Senator's words) to be "launch[ing]a fundraising drive that isn't about dollars.". But his astonishing first-quarter campaign finance haul of $25.7 million included $17.5 million from "big donors" ($1000 and up) - a sum higher than the much more genuinely populist and remarkably pro-labor John Edwards' total take ($14 million) from all donors. According to Chicago Sun Times columnist Lynn Sweet, "Obama talks about transforming politics and touts the donations of ‘ordinary' people to his campaign, a network of more than 100 elite Democratic ‘bundlers' is raising millions of dollars for his White House bid. The Obama campaign prefers the emphasis be on the army of small donors who are giving - and raising - money for Obama. In truth, though, there are two parallel narratives - and the other is that Obama is also heavily reliant on wealthy and well-connected Democrats." How can I trust him when he says one thing and does another?
What do you think of my ideal goverment for 2008? What do you think of my ideal goverment for 2008? here are a few: President: Condoleezza Rice Vice President: Jeb Bush Environmental Protection: Al Gore Homeland Security : Duncan Hunter Department of Defense: Rudi Giuliani Department of Education: Laura Bush Department of Justice: Hillary Clinton Department of Energy: John Edwards Drug Control Policy: Mike Huckabee Housing & Urban Development: Mitt Romney Veterans Affairs: John McCain I know there are more department jobs but I don't want to name them all.
Obama has no experience? Weigh in!? I just want you guys to weigh in about why you think Obama doesn't have enough experience? This is what I think: You experience talkers are funny! Bush had tons of experience, so did Rumsfeld and Chenney. Bush also had a relative in the white house at one point in time, and he was governor of Texas, and he still fucked up! The only experience established politicians in America have is protecting special interest groups and screwing over the American people! Some of the best presidents of this country had very little experience aka JFK, Ronald Reagan, and Abraham Lincoln .He has ten years experience in public office, more than the two other Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton (six-plus years as Senator from New York) and John Edwards (six years as Senator from North Carolina). Barack's first eight years spent in the Illinois senate before his two years (and counting) of service in the U.S. Senate, should not be forgotten. Obama has served in the Illinois state senate, the united states senate, the foreign relations committee, &the Veteran's affair committee. That's more than enough experience. Oh yeah, thanks cedykema! I totally forgot about all the "grassroots" work he did. He was a Georgetown professor, teaching students about the political system, worked as a community organizer, University of Chicago lecturer, and civil rights lawyer before running for public office. But people don't tend to pay attention to those things so I just listed the hard facts!
Is Obama Someone We can Trust with Diplomacy and Complex Foreign Affairs? Senator Dodd of Connecticut offered the most stinging criticism, singling out Mr. Obama's comments on Pakistan. "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this morning," Mr. Dodd said in a statement. "But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power." Mr. Dodd said that while he would move against Osama bin Laden and other terrorists, he would not "declare my intentions for specific military action to the media in the context of a political campaign." The campaign of Senator Biden of Delaware sent out a statement to "congratulate" Mr. Obama on his "Johnny-come-lately" position, citing a long-standing push by Mr. Biden for more troops and reconstruction aid to Afghanistan and for more cooperation from Pakistan in the war on terrorism. But Mr. Biden, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also chastised Mr. Obama for being too specific. "The last thing you want to do is telegraph to the folks in Pakistan that we are about to violate their sovereignty," he said in an appearance at the National Press Club, according to his campaign. John Edwards of North Carolina and Governor Richardson of New Mexico did not criticize Mr. Obama directly, but issued statements saying that while they would use military force to fight terrorism, their focus would be on diplomacy first.
Is Obama Someone We can Trust with Diplomacy and Complex Foreign Affairs? Senator Dodd of Connecticut offered the most stinging criticism, singling out Mr. Obama's comments on Pakistan. "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this morning," Mr. Dodd said in a statement. "But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power." Mr. Dodd said that while he would move against Osama bin Laden and other terrorists, he would not "declare my intentions for specific military action to the media in the context of a political campaign." The campaign of Senator Biden of Delaware sent out a statement to "congratulate" Mr. Obama on his "Johnny-come-lately" position, citing a long-standing push by Mr. Biden for more troops and reconstruction aid to Afghanistan and for more cooperation from Pakistan in the war on terrorism. But Mr. Biden, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also chastised Mr. Obama for being too specific. "The last thing you want to do is telegraph to the folks in Pakistan that we are about to violate their sovereignty," he said in an appearance at the National Press Club, according to his campaign. John Edwards of North Carolina and Governor Richardson of New Mexico did not criticize Mr. Obama directly, but issued statements saying that while they would use military force to fight terrorism, their focus would be on diplomacy first.
Where have I been, JOHN EDWARDS had an affair? Fathered a child?? I usually watch CNN and sometimes Katie Couric's CBS news. But I haven't at all heard anything about JOHN EDWARD'S love affair until today!! Apparently John Edwards had a long love affair with his campaign worker. Has CNN reported on this? Boy are we going to hear about this in the coming days! He's no longer going to be considered for Obama's VP or maybe he should! Anyway, Edwards is backing Obama, I wonder if we will ever see John Edwards with Obama again? For me, this is breaking news, did you all know about this?? if you google this subject you'll find alot, I'll just mention one here. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,391426,00.html One more question, apparently the National Enquirer broke this story and I'm trying to look at National Enquirer's website but it doesn't show up. It just says "under construction." Is NE's website down right now or am I the only one having this problem? ITSME: Sorry? How does this matter at all? He's a moot subject and not even in the running. ITSME, it matters because John Edwards is backing Obama. I'm wondering if Obama will ever want Edwards support now. Besides this happened awhile ago and I'm stunned that I didn't know about this. Why didn't this come out during the primaries?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers