Hillary Clinton Pictures Knowledge Base
Did Hillary Clinton take pictures (Steal) from the White House? I've heard that when the "Clinton's" left the White House, Hillary took some pictures for herself that were in the White House prior to their moving in and/or didn't personally belong to the Clinton administration. Is this true and where might I find more information on this?
Pictures of Hillary Clinton in a skirt? I am looking for pictures of Hillary Clinton in a skirt. None of the pictures I have seen on Google show Hillary Clinton in a skirt. The few that do show below the waist all show her dressd in pants. What I am really looking for is the view of Hillary Clinton during the last presidential speech. I don't really know where to post this question as the question crosses many boundries? P.S. What would you rather see Hillary Clinton dressed in? Pants or Skirt, or does it matter?
What do you do when someone critisizes you for bashing Hillary Clinton? I have been getting a lot of negative feedback lately on my screenname. Since I cannot post my 360 picture, it's not helping that either.(Don't worry, I don't have an anti-hillary picture on 360, I use Brak for my picture) I have friends on here who like my screenname and share the same opinions but I also get a lot of negative responses. What do you do when that happens?
Does Anyone Else Think That the Media Hates Hillary Clinton? Seriously, every time I see a website, newspaper, magazine, or television program concerning Hillary Clinton I see pictures of her either yelling, pointing her finger, or looking frustrated and angry. Do you think the media simply hates Hillary or that maybe they are femnist or simply think its funny to mock her? In contrast, when they present Obama - the other candidate who has raised a lot of eyes in the public, he is presented smiling, confident, and calm. It just seems very opposite.
why does hillary clinton remind me of a pile of poop? everytime i see a picture of hillary clinton on the news i just say to myself, "ewww." why? is it because she is a flaming liberal? is it because she stood up for her husband who lied and cheated on her? is it because everytime i think of her becoming president i shudder at the thought?
Will Hillary Clinton be the Britney Spears of the 2008 Election? How soon after she suffers a crippling defeat in Ohio and Texas will it be before she snaps, shaves her head, and has to be hauled away to the hospital in an ambulance with a police escort to keep the Paparazzi away? Will Hillary have to go into rehab for substance abuse after her husband files for divorce and she has her visitation rights revoked for going nuts? Or, powers above help us, will we eventually be seeing pictures of her getting out of her car?
Hillary Clinton Commemorative Stamp? The US Postal Service has issued a recall of a stamp they created with a picture of Hillary Clinton to honor her achievements while serving as the First Lady of our nation. The problem was discovered when claims had been made that the stamp was not sticking to envelopes, and that mail which had been sent using the "Hillary" postage was not being delivered. Senator Clinton demanded a full investigation into the allegations. A special Postal Service Investigation team was formed and after several months and many dollars spent, made the following findings: *The stamp was manufactured properly. *There was nothing wrong with the adhesive. *People were just spitting on the wrong side
What is the limit down home country girl Hillary Clinton is willing to go in efforts to court trash votes? Will she reveal that her real name is Brandine Guthrie? Will she sport a Dale Ernhart windbreaker over her pantsuit? Will she drive a monster truck? A picture speaks a thousand words http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Mike-Easley-Sen-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-Gastonia-North-Carolina-Gov/photo//080503/480/5690d1d78f1f47708886eab2558c9821//s:/ap/20080504/ap_on_el_pr/democrats;_ylt=AmpHPwLvsHyDxjXAPgkDShhh24cA Good to see Clinton getting down to her Wal-Mart roots. Maybe she can up her cred by getting arrested after throwing a hub cap at Bill? How about a guest appearance on Hee Haw? Playing sax on Arsenio worked for her husband, image how much pub a jug solo would do. The thing is, bekind, I find the manner in which Clinton is pandering to the downscale voters insulting to the group. I grew up in a working class community, and if she thinks that she can convince people that she's a cut and shoot bar sh*tkicker by sipping a shot of whiskey and standing on a pickup truck, that's a bit insulting.
Obama and Hillary Clinton are meeting on June 26th @ Mayflower Hotel, any Hillary supporters attending? Obama and Hillary are meeting at an event at the Mayflower Hotel June 26th. Who in the right mind Hillary Clinton supporters are going? I'd go to the hotel and scream "DENVER, DENVER, DENVER" if I can. I can picture Hillary and Obama and a few other people in a half empty room. How can any Hillary Clinton supporter go to that event? Anyone in the Washington DC area going there to protest? I'd love to go there to raise hell and shout "DENVER, DENVER!!!"
Is is just me or is Hillary Clinton super sexy? I think Hillary Clinton is super sexy! From her teeth, to her eyes, just her whole face is beautiful! Heres a picture of you forgot what she looks like! http://b.imagehost.org/view/0236/lllllll.jpg Im talking about in a sexual way. She turns me on!
What do you think of this open letter to Hillary Clinton? Although I do not like the morals of your husband or your condonation of such, the jokes being thrown around about how Bill will run the white house anyway and how you will have to let him have whatever women he wants there doing whatever, ......maybe there is some hope in you yet! Now economic leaders of our country have been naively claiming that the reason our country is having so much economic strife for hard working Americans is the subprime slime. Let me make it perfectly clear, subprime slime is NOT the reason we are in economic strife! Hillary, it is my belief that technology and automation, although they make our lives easier, they are removing the major source of income for the majority of hard working Americans who have had jobs in the past! Things are getting more and more automated. It won't be long til a person in this world will not have to move hardly a finger to get all of his or her needs to live! This is happening worldwide not just in the US! Only where we value human life is the cost so great! Non insured countries that do not value human life do not care about the condition of their citizenry. Jobs are becoming, at best, temporary situations, mostly of the past. Right now we are in a transition to that jobless society in civilized countries of the world, but we are being blindsided by the automation and technology! GM already makes a car that you don't have to drive, for God's sake! It is not in production yet, but it will be. Can you picture a Taxi company with no taxi drivers? It is coming, Hillary! And so, who gets the money? Who deserves the money? Will the invisible driver get paid? lol Our jobs are going away! The illusion of the past 5 years rise in business profits, in stock market situations, has lulled us into thinking we were in a boom time! Actually, we were and we are in trouble! The need for humans to help humans is going away! And it is happening right under our noses. And since we are still multiplying, what happens to people without jobs? Do we just try to find something wrong with them and qualify people for disability for life? I think we need to add something to the Bill of Rights....and the Constitution. Americans have the right and shall not be discriminated as citizens, from getting a subsistence to live off of that is fair as long as they are willing to give reasonable help to their fellow citizens! If a person is living within their means, they deserve food, shelter, clothing at a minimum! Job or no job! We can't have unemployment benefits running out! Easy for rich people to let that happen. And we should not be calling it unemployment benefits. That is a negative term. What people get to live on is deserved, not questionable, not an "un" anything! Humans are what they are, they are definitely not "uns", huns, honey, sweeties maybe, but definitely not "uns". Anybody who wants to be a citizen and wants to help others the best that they can is no "un" and should not be considered "un" anything. The value they possess is an inalienable right! Time and time again civil mankind has asserted this! Subprime slime was driven by greedy people wanting to squeeze a last foreseeable dime of the working public before it disappeared from their investment radar screens! But, with or without subprime slime, we were headed for troubles. It would only be a matter of a few years or less as the technological automation boom overtakes our means to support our lives, to feed ourselves to maintain our households. In an effort to build and sell the promise of investment structures, the investors overbuilt in a time where the economy was beginning to withdraw due to an inverted future profit future growth automation curve. Actually, most of society knows we are headed into attempting to get humans to own what they need and use what resources they need, wasting less, recycling more etc. Perhaps there is a greater plan to bulldoze houses and herd people into huge government projects in the near future? We have worked ourselves out of meaningful employment...most of us! It is natural when you have developed natural human ingenuity and spunk. So my question is what do you want to do about this automation technology human capital valuation dilemna? My suggestion for the short term til we figure this out wholly is this. We need an adult citizen rebate not tied to income, of $5000 to every married couple below 110k and $2500 to every single citizen below 85k, and we need it this year! Long term we have a need for a subsistence program unlike any ever taken on in the history of mankind to get started. Something on the lines of Social Security, Welfare, Pensions, etc, but with the purpose of growth of human intellectual gathered effort of the Amercian public, expanding automation and technology with a goal of making a day when humans cannot die! Then we need legislation that would make it mandatory for people to seek work/education opportunity from home at least via internet but for employment agencies to either get them work or get them a subsistence allowance to live off of or pay for the education program that would get them work, period. Nobody deserves to starve! Nobody deserves to lose their livelihood if they dont have the capacity to fit our society's opportunities to work. Retired people who seek work in mental jobs that are willing to train for those jobs who do not want to spend their life's savings to continue their education should not be required to do so to get training benefits and to qualify for course studies in whatever they want to learn about. Studies should be driven by citizen demand to learn, especially for health and automation to preserve our civilization and it's health. There should not be effort to limit what a person's value is as far as being worthy of living and learning. You want to learn, you get given the opportunity to learn and take courses and get degrees to get access to information to learn for society's benefit, civilization's benefit and become proficient without regards of means to pay for these things. Insurance costs make it more expensive to keep people physically working because if they get hurt, they cost us as a society more money, the value of life there. Armed Forces responsibility is being overtaken by automation. Remote controlled robotic machines are beginning to fight our wars and we are losing less and less soldiers as a result! So dangerous jobs are being done by more and more robotic creations. It is cheaper to automate. I fear that people will chose to eat greater quantities of cheaper processed foods that will increasingly put them in a genocidal path to terminal cancers if subsistences are not increased. My fear is that the economic strife of our automated country will drive a wedge between the haves and the have nots because the "lower" haves will be losing what they have because the have nots will pay less and less tax because they cannot afford it and gradually the people on the edge of "have" are going to fall into the pit of not having. This will drive a wedge further into a place, an issue our country has not tackled before this, at least not on the scale we are about to experience! And that issue is religious discrimination, particularly Christian versus non Christian. I do fear this difference especially in a pressured society that has not realized it's true enemy and it's possible friend....automation. It has been going on, but it has the capacity to get much worse. Governments are already using Christian Churches for distribution of governmental services. This is not separation of church and state! We are headed for a time when the organized social religious cult engines in this country that have presided predominantly over the marriages and deaths of the general populous over the years, probably meaning well, licensed by the federal government, organizations that at have based themselves over time on false premises, unproven mythology, that require their parishoners ....at least in principle....to swear to undebated undiscerned illogical conclusions about life(such as the infallibility of Jesus Christ for all his life), may wind up deciding who gets what and who does not, becoming official distribution centers of necessities and helping their own first! This would be a continued abhorrence of liberty and Constitutional Rights! But unless it is checked, unless we repeal the Privacy Act of 1974 provisions that allowed people to hire their own and give preference to Christians, the status quo of that time and now in organization of the populous, without any recourse for that favor showing, hidden behind legal non collection of statistics in the work places, then we are headed for severe religious discrimination! And if you and other legislators don't do something about it, you are cowardous bullies, enjoying your self appointed "chosenness" and I am sick inside of that slime! For I am an honest man who seeks honest humanity! The strength of our society and economy lies in its ability to automate. Automation is putting us out of jobs. Loss of jobs means people without enough to live on. If we have enough resources to feed the public and there is need, the public must be fed, clothed and shelterred from here on out or we have no country! The government must print money and allow credit for people to live on! If not, you may as well kiss this country and possibly civilization goodbye. This idea of National Debt is fubar. The people of this country, humanity in general are deserving of being paid forward! If our society can help parents have 13 kids, then they can help the people who are living now too. This is about humans right to a living, not about automation beings or robots needing food and water and necessities! Stagflation is going to rise until we decide that human capital is worthy and decide we are going to grant humanity, humans, value that deserves to be paid for living, for existing and hopefully adding further to intellectual development and a better society out into the future. Human intellectual capital must be held as the primary source of income for all Americans from this point forward! I am not talking degrees, so much as efforts in directions of study and collaborative efforts, orgainzed or less organized to help humanity grow in the knowledge to sustain itself. At some point in time into the future, human brains will be instantly linked. We are not there yet, but it is coming. We need to prepare for that day. In that day, there will be no Congress, no President, no leader....only pure instant consensus and action on the behalf of humans moment by moment collectively. Money in businesses is sitting on the sidelines because there is no place to go. Automation has made it possible to do things with less and less capital. Hence a stock market that is collapsing and money being borrowed hand over fist to try to stay in business for some whose businesses are stressed. We already have many people doing things that don't need to be done and being paid to do them. If we make it a right to live and be healthy, then it will become a crime to limit someone's privilidge to have what they need to live on and we will be killing all the people who cannot get a job? These people will become sick and overcome our healthcare system. Humans have multiplied so fast and done such a good job of making things easier for themselves, making huge profits....some of them, that now we have a major paradigm shift staring us right in the face! The old opportunities have fled. The new opportunities are going to disappear almost as fast as the old ones did. What makes a person worthy of a living, worthy of a paycheck? Intellectual Property Development may become the last bastion of human profitability, but that is only going to last for a short while, possibly less than 10 years. An idea about automation can be quickly put into production in a matter of months these days. Within the next few years, we are looking at a far faster rate. Again, humans are getting quite crafty in their organization and timely manufacturing capabilities etc. Can we see it? What are we going to do about it? Government Welfare, or making government administrative jobs for people so that they have a job is counterproductive to energy costs, counterproductive to population movement necessity, counterproductive to Global Warming goals, etc. If you pay people to stay home and or gather to help each other in civil law abiding neighborhoods, educating them to care for one another and build and share their knowledge playfully with one another, it is cheaper in the long run. Internet can be used as a communication method. Naturally, people should be encouraged to move into more urban areas, less costly to commute to get their food and services etc. Gradually, the great mansions of the past should be discouraged They waste human resources. Gathering in places like Community Centers should be encouraged more. So, that is my outlook. I am just a retired electrician mechanic that observes the world around him. I believe in healthy living. I believe in living by being as respectful of others as possible. I believe that people will do the right thing if they are presented with the proper evidence that things are moving the way a professor says they are. I think, if our government officials look at the statistics, they will conclude, as I have, that we are on the edge of a new Age, an Age we have actually already enterred a while back that we had no idea would bring us to this point..most of us didn't. We are at the age of automation that is erasing the need for us to do anything. An age where we are going to become part of the intellectual communication, intellectual bonding of an automation that will head mankind into near future deathless society! Meanwhile we have to decide we are worthy of it and make the laws and society move in the direction of the balance that it takes to provide for that society! Too long? Do you mean that Hillary is too uneducated, too mixed up, too self centerred, to read and be able to comprehend? I think you might be right! I support Obama for President! Boring? as in being petty or having no substance? Can you read? Perhaps you too have the Hillary attention span? Or maybe your candidate is smarter than you are. I think she is! Hope you can get more education in your future and participate in a more intelligent way in political discussions thereby. Healing be unto you and yours and me and mine In Forgive Affirmed Spirit ~skahhh mkwarble I don't have extreme dislike for Hillary! Right now she is my second choice, Ron Paul my third choice, McCain my 4th choice. Somewhere along the lines, our lives call us to make choices in this illusion we live in. So if you say that choosing Obama is hating Hillary, well so be your logic! Shows how much reasoning you are capable of using with all the words in the dictionary to choose from! Martha, I think they care. I think you err. I think as our society progresses you are going to see more and more involvement by citizens like me, coming from the internet and drafted bills that congress will be voting on there. That's why I like Obama most! He is for that sort of thing. Change....it is not just a 6 lettter word! Yutsnark, I call her out in the first paragraph. Now she needs to show us why, with the problems addressed below that, she is the one ready to lead this country! If she can't get by the lack of morals of her husband, she can never be a President! Tx trott, well your statement is a lie, right? I mean you did call me Sparky! lol. Thanks for reading, since Noone must not include you! You are somebody! You ever meet Jesse Jackson? lol Rockpaq, Did you know that crap, waste matter discharged from the body, esp. feces, has nearly an infinite number of uses? At least you didn't say "useless"! Good for you! And if you ever have experienced a load of crap, you know you feel a lot better after having one and you know all of your senses are surrounded by it! I have never found crap to be all that borning myself. Hope your bowels feel better soon! lol You deserve to feel better.
Dems need to ask themselves this question: Can Hillary Clinton win the national election? I can already picture that 'embarrassed look' and 'please everyone' attitude in the debates. I honestly don't think she can win. Regardless of her female status. Amy, were we as naive in 2004 as we were in 2000? Were the citizens of California as naive immediately after the election of their governor in 2004 as they were immediately before it? Americans are for the most part dumb and will always be. But Hillary still has that embarrassed look. I think Obama has a better chance than Hillary in the general e.
~*~Texas Voters~*~-----~*~Hillary Clinton~*~-------? Everything is bigger in Texas – including the Election. In Texas Hillary needs your support TWICE to put our country back in the solutions business. 1st - VOTE FOR HILLARY IN THE PRIMARY WHY: * 2/3 of Texas delegates are chosen by VOTING HOW: * Vote Early – The last day to Vote Early is Friday, February 29th * Or vote on Election Day (March 4th) 2nd - ATTEND YOUR LOCAL CONVENTION FOR HILLARY WHY: * 1/3 of Texas delegates are chosen at Local Precinct Conventions * Hillary’s supporters must attend their local convention so Hillary can receive the delegates that are rightfully hers HOW: * Stand up for Hillary - arrive at Precinct Conventions early, 7:00PM * Bring your picture ID * Precinct Conventions take place at your polling location - these locations will be available online very soon at www.hillaryclinton.com/texas * Only Texans who have voted early, voted by mail, or voted on Election Day are eligible to attend their Local Precinct Convention http://www.hillaryclinton.com/hq/texas/
Hillary Clinton PROPOSES $5,000 allotment for every new baby, THOUSANDS of Autistics STAND in the cold, WHY??? Hillary Clinton PROPOSES $5,000 allotment for every new baby, THOUSANDS of Autistics STAND in the cold, WHY??? With all the Publicity and Epidemic of Autistic Children in America, supposed Billions have been awarded for "Research" , Still families struggle financially to Raise, Medical Bills, Entertain, Babysitters willing to watch children with Autism, etc. Yet, perfectly healthy newborns are already ensured for "future" college and living quarters. Many that would recieve this $5,000 are upperclass parents. Something is wrong with this picture. Perhaps, if families with one even two Autistic children had this money to deal with the "present" a HUGE difference could be made in the life of these children. Let the Parents do the research, by means of mind stimulating activities and the Money in which to do it. Does anyone agree? Are any parents in the same boat? what is the going rate of a "welfare check" nowadays (welfare to work) last time I checked, parents of children were required to put in 40 hours per week and grossed about 130.00 per week/ and recieved it twice a month -- sround 260.00 every two weeks, maybe less. I'm sure you could find that out - easy. As far as the wealthy not needing this $5,000 - well of course we all know they aren't going to turn down money, they never have , so they are guarenteed it. It is ashame, though, how blinded people are, with titles and mumble jumble... Do you actually think the poor are prospering, and hiding money in their floor, somewhere??? They have enough dignity, not to ask for that welfare check, because they percieve, it could cost them their LIVELIHOOD! ...And all of these figures that you see that are awarded to social programs; I guarentee you 60-70% of it isn't being utilized because of the red tape. A poor man would rather work one day in tobacco and make around $100 -- seems to make more sense, right?
Can you please tell me when this picture of Hillary Clinton was taken? My wife says it was after her and Bill were married, but I think it was right after they wined and dined some Chinese contributors. http://www.3dimages.co.uk/gallery/d/714-2/Creature+exBLagoon.jpg benjamin. Not only am I married to a young hottie, I have a great job...and obviously a great sense of humor...its funny dude..take some time to relax in life..you'll live longer! After thinking this post over, I believe it was in very poor taste on my part. I'd like to offer my sincerest deepest apology..from the bottom of my heart I APOLOGIZE...to the creature from the black lagoon..sorry big guy!
Disproportionately high number of news items about Clinton on the Yahoo! mail home page? OK - so I've noticed that it seems like every other time I log into my Yahoo! mail, there's a picture of Hillary Clinton or a news item about her, usually with some sort of positive light on her or her campaign. Has anyone else gotten the impression that someone is not being very balanced in their news coverage, or am I just hyper-sensitive, or what?
Why would anyone vote for lobbyist hacks like Fred Thompson or Hillary Clinton? Or Rudy Giuliani, or John Edwards, or Mitt Romney, or… well you get the picture. ruth- no I don't mean lawyers. and I have an education. and i do have a lawyer. and no my attitude does not effect my lawyer's practice. and by lobbyist hack, i mean someone who serves the wrong interest, as in the lobbyists' interest and not the public interest. ruth- by the way, what's the difference between a lawyer and catfish? one's a scum sucking bottom dweller, and the other one is a fish. ruth- give me a break. I fully understand the fundamentals of lobbying. Money is influence, influence is power... and I'm not surprised it works that way too. Besides, my question is, why would anyone vote for who is OBVIOUSLY acting in the lobbyists' interest and not ours. Corporations ccan have whatever lobbying ability they want, but it's not right that they can buy favorable policy.
Republicans support Hillary Clinton? There are 2 people seeking the Democratic Nomination for President both meet the criteria to run for the office of President of the United States; however only one of them is qualified! If you were charged with hiring the new person and were handed the resume from each of the Democratic candidates with no name, sex, race, religion, public situations going on, none of that. The only thing you were going to see is public office work experience and accomplishments. You certainly would be looking for relevant work experience, amount of experience and other related accomplishments. Which resume would you hand to the hiring manager? It is a pretty simple choice Hillary Clinton is the only qualified candidate seeking the Democratic Nomination for President of the United States. Our Country needs to get on to the important business of the National debates, this gives America insights into the Candidates as a person and how they view life. The debates are very important to America. This is where we learn so much about the intentions and character of our next leader Barack Obama is, unqualified to run for the office, additionally, he is scandal ridden and by staying in the race He is slowing America down by keeping us from being able to focus and debate on the issues that are important to America! He was happy and content with the choices he made and the beliefs that he supported for years, now when those are an embarrassment to him he is claiming ignorance, non-support and attempting to distance himself from them. Not change but distance himself from them. Barack Obama look at your past 20 years – that paints an accurate picture of who you are and what you think of America. Your unwillingness to exit a race you can’t win and by refusing to step aside you are holding America back from attending to important campaign issues that need to be discussed. Barack Obama everyday up wait to succeed cost America a little more. While I disagree with Hillary Clinton on several issue, and am convicted she is wrong. I acknowledge and recognize, that when it comes to the Office of the President of the United States, Hillary Clinton is the only one seeking the Democratic Nomination that is qualified. A.Republican! How do other Republicans see it?
Who is Huma and why the republicans are spreading rumors that she have a lesbian liaison with Hillary Clinton? I would like to know from the republicans who came with that story if they have any true sources. I came across her picture and she have nothing in common with Hillary. http://selflaugh.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/huma_hillary.jpg Brigadier General Janis Kapinski,during her commandment in Iraq, had a pretty and young young women from Lebanon. An Arabic-English interpret and secretary.I never hear any rumors about them from U.S soldiers,even though they were always together. Here is the picture of Brigadier Kapinski http://members.optusnet.com.au/amiliofoo/kapinski.jpg Why when it come to democrats there are always rumors?
Does Hillary Clinton....? Scare the crap out of you?!?! She is way creepy! In all the pictures there is of her she has like 200 chins and looks like she is going to kill you! What do you think? Hey guys I am just stating my opinion about her looks! I hate her for a lot more reasons than her looks! so many good answers! well, with a FEW exceptions!
Pictures of Metro-North Presidential Train? About five years ago as I was getting off a commuter train in Grand Central Terminal in New York City, I saw a curious train. It had a standard Metro-North engine, but there were only two cars connected to it. The first car was decked out with several offices: leather interior, wooden desks, wall-to-wall carpeting. The second car was more of a bar / reception area. Both cars had the seal of the President of the United States. I was guessing that when Bill and Hillary Clinton were living in Westchester County, New York, that was the train Bill took to go to work in Manhattan. Does anyone know where I can find more about this train or know where I can find pictures of this? I have searched the Internet and I can't find anything.
What is behind the H. Clinton fenomena:? Different nations print different money by different colors of ink. The USA also deals by printed currency, using a 3 letter word as its evaluation. But money deflates worldwide, because the true authority of printed money is a 9 letter word in english. Rare metal is beaten in the US by the pictures of woman. But we all know, industrial prosperity was posible by the mass usage of money, and its value is not etaloned by rare metals, but by the geographical distance of pryers. Dollar is far away of pryers, inflates slower than any other currency of the world. Who are the exporters of "woman money"? Russia, South Africa. So a racist trend represents itself in a masterfully masked politician:Hillary Clinton. Has Barack Obama chance to win against South Africa? Has gold and platinum has a chance to win against prosperity? Nothing is impossible. But Shemzeda'j , the devil of ink is stand authority of prosperity for both idealists and materialists alike.
Hillary: Is this serious? I know she is serious on her Presidential bid but..... While I was here on Yahoo! Answers one of those little advertising boxes on the left of the screen had a little ad for anti-Bush cursors. They fade away leaving a picture of her and below it it says "Paid for by the Hillary Clinton for President Exploratory Committee". What? I don't like the woman and wouldn't vote for her but I can't believe she would sink so low as to sell anti-Bush cursors! So is this for real or what? ELWAY: If you are right and this is a way to get people to go to her site, it is still way too low. The "Join the Conversion" is downright freaky. She sounds put at the head of some mythical religion - convert, CONVERT! If my Anglican church did that the ACLU would be all over our backs before you could say lawsuit. IF that committee really thinks that Hillary is the proper course for the nation and they feel that the majority also feel that way, "Join Us" would be better. I know that for the rest of us this is just semantics, but when you are running for office, ESPECIALLY President, words need to be chosen with care. That she would trust people with who cannot write in a non-insulting way is another reason not to vote for her. I will not convert to the Church of Hillary. No, I didn't go to the site. I don't want a virus.
Yuck, who will vote for Hillary Clinton? I don't want her to be our First female President. Look at all ugly pictures, especially with her panties exposed. That lady is ugly. We had 2 Bushes... we don't need another Clinton in the White House... Come on, let give somebody else a chance. eww look at that picture http://www.usasurvival.org/images/hillary.jpg
Why Did Hillary Clinton LIE About Obama? So you all must of heard about the whole Obama and NAFTA thing. Well, now the truth has finally come out and Hillary is caught red-handed. She exaggerated things about Obama and made it seem like Obama was the liar. This woman will say and do anything to make herself look good. She first released a picture of Obama wearing traditional African clothing on a trip he made to insinuate he some sort of Muslim, which is false. And now she is lying about the NAFTA thing as well. On the Canadian Embassy website: "In the recent report produced by the Consulate General in Chicago, there was no intention to convey, in any way, that Senator Obama and his campaign team were taking a different position in public from views expressed in private, including about NAFTA. We deeply regret any inference that may have been drawn to that effect. For more detailed explaination of all this go to the link below. After reading, you might want to watch the video provided at the same site, at the right-hand side by Neil McDonald. http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/03/03/obama-canada.html?ref=rss There is also this video you can watch: http://youtube.com/watch?v=eLJJ88HTiX8
Have you heard this about Clinton -- and this is how she spins it. Scary isnt it? Judy Wallman, a professional genealogical researcher, discovered that Hillary Clinton's great-great uncle, Remus Rodham, was hanged for horse stealing and train robbery in Montana in 1889. The only known photograph of Remus shows him standing on the Gallows. On the back of the picture is this inscription: "Remus Rodham; horse thief, sent to Montana Territorial Prison 1885, escaped 1887, robbed the Montana Flyer six times, caught by Pinkerton Detectives, convicted and hanged in 1889. A Lady e-mailed Hillary Clinton for comments. Hillary's staff of Professional image adjusters sent back the following biographical sketch: "Remus Rodham was a famous cowboy in the Montana Territory. His business empire grew to include acquisition of valuable equestrian assets and intimate dealings with the Montana railroad. Beginning in 1883, he devoted several years of his life to service at a government facility, finally taking leave to resume his dealings with the railroad. In 1887, he was a key player in a vital investigation run by the renowned Pinkerton Detective Agency. In 1889, Remus passed away during an important civic function held in his honor when the platform upon which he was standing collapsed." Technically she isnt lying. Civil meeting in his honour, standing on a platform and it collapsed. Never her an execution sound so eloquent. Thats a very dangerous woman, with as much corruptness in her blood as bush has from his mothers side with another failure of a president (PIERCE) BOY DO I FEEL STUPID THIS WAS FROM ONE OF MY EMPLOYEES! ILL SLAP MYSELF FOR THIS ONE. THANKS FOR THE CORRECTION
Hillary Clinton as a Girl Scout...? My daughter is a Junior Girl Scout and her troop has been assigned the USA as their country for Thinking Day (each troop researches and presents a country at a gathering of several troops). They are doing a section titled: Famous American Women Who Were Girl Scouts and of course the most famous is Mrs. Clinton. Does anybody know where I can find a picture of her when she was a Girl Scout? Thanks!
How are Y.A. OFFICIALS picked ? have you noticed they have a profile pic and it says OFFICIAL under their name..... just like the Hillary Clinton picture.... what gives ? I WANT ONE !
why or is hillary clinton a hypocrite? i think it was yesterday or this moring she leaked out photo's and e-mailed pictures of Obama dressed in a turban. so basically it was saying would you vote for a muslim? but what makes me think that she's the shadiest one of them all and the biggest hypocrat is because when she went to Vietnam and wore a sun hat(those round cone hats) how come she doesnt say, 'would you vote for a communist?", or when she went to the middle east and dressed in one of those scarfs that women wear why diddnt she say "would you vote for me a terrorist?" im not saying that there communist and terrorist but what i am saying is why when he wears a turban he has to be a muslim? face the fact Obama is not a muslim, he wore the turban and the outfit to show respect for their culture. the name Barrack is Burrick in hebrew and its a bible name, Obama in translation to english is equilvilant to Smith or Jones. and Huisein come on that 1st grade insult. her middle name is Rodham, sounds like dennis rodman to me. i heard it was the "clintons" on the washington post.... i might have read it wrong but thats what it said and there the biggest news in the world
Hillary Clinton is in the house and she is on Yahoo Answers, have you answered one of her questions? see below I just added her to my contacts, if u click on the link below it will take you to her profile page, the word official is next to her picture in green text, this is the first celeb I have seen on yahoo answers, I wonder when will Tina Turner be on here, I am a half celebrity but I haven't been discovered yet. itsn't it fun to have famous people on yahoo answers, http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=Ahpz6TpnfCP0.oJAO0GKJs_sy6IX;_ylv=3?show=1209af80908c430bafa2f9713e8d0a4caa u know it's really her by the word official next to her picture, try clicking that word and u will see a celebrity on yahoo, that word is in green text color, it's really her. only celebrities have the official badge next to thei photo.
Is hillary Racist? This is not base on anything this just my gut feeling. Just the attuide towrds him and her not really saying congrats quickly in the iowa cacaus. is alittle fissy to me. I am not saying she is nor am i saying she not. I think she is though. http://absentee.blogspot.com/2005/11/hillary-clinton-is-racist.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-newman/clinton-campaigns-drug-_b_76674.html http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/17/clinton.plantation/index.html http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=200285&whichpage=1? this link shouldnt effect anyone has the picture is totally fake. I think she is there are links up there look at them before you comment! Kanoa S - and do you know which color the childern where no so dont bring b.s into here just beacause she does that dosent mean she cant be still racist. yes acutally it does matter
Why do you people hate Hillary Clinton so...? I sense great leadership in this person. Maybe she will be one of the greatest leaders of all time. I think, if a woman, running for president were to run, and she does know her stuff, I mean, she had plenty of time to study, and know whats really going on. She cannot mess this up, she has to win, and she has to make one of the biggest impressions that this world has ever seen. Did you see Pluto Nash by the way, he picture is on the front of a $1000 or $10000 bill. I really mean it this time, I really think this next 5 years will be really somthin... Come on people tell me what do you think...? Not to mention shes with the whole gay and lesbian rights thing. Tell me what you think...? And don't look at it as thats shes a damn woman, thats just wrong.
Hillary Clinton PROPOSES $5,000 allotment for every new baby, THOUSANDS of Autistics STAND in the cold, WHY??? With all the Publicity and Epidemic of Autistic Children in America, supposed Billions have been awarded for "Research" , Still families struggle financially to Raise, Medical Bills, Entertain, Babysitters willing to watch children with Autism, etc. Yet, perfectly healthy newborns are already ensured for "future" college and living quarters. Many that would recieve this $5,000 are upperclass parents. Something is wrong with this picture. Perhaps, if families with one even two Autistic children had this money to deal with the "present" a HUGE difference could be made in the life of these children. Let the Parents do the research, by means of mind stimulating activities and the Money in which to do it. Does anyone agree? Are any parents in the same boat? yeah, why not? $5,000 to have a baby, fine details of actually what that will put these future children into -- you could be signing your kid away I like 'personal' stories yes, but how much federal money will be SAVED considering many of them won't be Autisitc?? America has plenty to waste on war, just not the neediest of civilians
Does Hillary Clinton have any hope left? gosh, i hope not...i love the picture on the drudge report this morning...the look in her eyes...absolute horror...i don't care for Obama either, but it sure is nice to see the Clintons lose...I LOVE THE SMELL OF CLINTONS FAILURE IN THE MORNING!! THAT SMELL,....YOU KNOW THAT CORRUPTION SMELL....THE WHOLE CAMPAIGN SMELLS LIKE IT....IT SMELLS LIKE....VICTORY!!
Does Hillary Clinton remind you of Stalin at all? OK, let's look at the facts. First we have the famous quote from her: We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. Which is very similar to Stalin's dream of perfect Communism. Plus, here is a 100% unaltered picture of her from her younger days: http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-wtQ_hdY9crK0Ko4Z7dpfurCUXQFdnA--?cq=1&p=41 Proof?
Why does Yahoo news always have a liberal slant? Yahoo seemingly chooses stories that paint a negative picture of Iraq, Israel, President Bush, Guns, Individualism, etc, while I constantly see smiling pictures of Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Cindy Sheehan, the U.N., starving children,... I am by no means a right-winger, but am I wrong here? Why is Yahoo this way?
My Hillary Jokes of the Week? U.S. POSTAL SERVICE ISSUES RECALL Nov. 1, 2007 8:** 10 AM AP Washington, D.C. * *The US Postal Service has issued a recall of a stamp they created with a picture of now U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton to honor her achievements while serving as the First Lady of our nation. The problem was discovered when claims had been made that the stamp was not sticking to envelopes, and that mail which had been sent using the "Hillary" postage was not being delivered. Senator Clinton demanded a full investigation into the allegations. A special Postal Service Investigation team was formed and after several months and millions of dollars spent, made the following findings :* *The stamp was manufactured properly. *There was nothing wrong with the adhesive. *People were just spitting on the wrong side.
Another Clinton Scam? isn't it ironic... paleeze... just another clinton gimick to work the numbers in their favor...gimme a freakin break! PORTSMOUTH, N.H. (AP) — When the hostages had been released and their alleged captor arrested, a regal-looking Hillary Rodham Clinton strolled out of her Washington home, the picture of calm in the face of crisis. The image, broadcast just as the network news began, conveyed the message a thousand town hall meetings and campaign commercials strive for — namely, that the Democratic presidential contender can face disorder in a most orderly manner. what a crock of S**T!!! can't you read? i said isn't it "ironic". any ninny can see that she manipulated a small town drama... just so idiots like you could "see" that she could perform under a stressfull situation... which, btw... comapres in NO way to 9/11. whatever gave you the idea that i am bashing females? i am the wife of a Soldier, and there are thousands of us, and we know how to be strong women who are able to act with grace and courage in the face of adversity. we just don't manipulate the situation to our advantage as she does. oh... and how about divorcing dear old bill? never... not as long as he can provide a politacal foothold for her to reach her goals. pfhss!!!
Why does Hillary think we cant take care of ourselves? Hillary Clinton has identified a grievous flaw in the contemporary American economy: It leaves “it all up to the individual.” This hateful individualism is allegedly driving income inequality and destroying the American Dream. Clinton calls it “the ‘on your own’ society,” displaying a liberal Democrat’s curious aversion to people doing things on their own. In contrast, she offers a collectivist vision of “shared responsibility for shared prosperity,” making the case for it based on a farrago of mistruths about the state of the economy. She actually is not interested in sharing anything, but instead hogging all the credit for economic growth in the 1990s for her husband and, by extension, herself. Clinton cites figures to paint a picture of an immiserated middle class, but avoids the main event. As Democratic economist Stephen Rose notes in his new book, Social Stratification in the United States, once people outside their prime working years are excluded — the elderly and the young — the median income for an American family is $63,000. Which, in the words of the Washington Post, “in most parts of the country buys a pretty comfortable middle-class lifestyle.” She maintains that corporations are taking more and more of national income for themselves, leaving workers in the cold. But according to Alan Reynolds of the Cato Institute, labor’s share of national income was a nearly constant 64.9 percent from 1960 to 2006. She says “the percentage of taxes paid by corporations have fallen,” when the percentage of taxes paid by corporations was 11.5 percent in 2006, higher than it was in 2000, at 8.2 percent. Clinton portrays the 1990s as a Paradise Lost that only she and her policies can rediscover. She wants “to hit the restart button on the 21st century and redo it the right way.” Like not having a tech bubble burst after it grew to unsustainable proportions in the late 1990s? Like not suffering from corporate scandals that stemmed from loose practices in the same period? No one can deny that the 1990s were good, but they wouldn’t hold up to the kind of demagogic critique of the economy Hillary makes now. She says we can’t “get tough” on China because of our debt, but President Clinton too was “soft” on China — all recent American presidents have had basically the same policy toward Beijing. She complains of CEO compensation increasing, but it grew right through the 1990s. In fact, former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich has made a Hillaryesque critique of the 1990s economy: “Most of the gains from the 1990s boom went to the people at the top.” The real news from Clinton’s speech is the way she, in keeping with the leftward shift of her party, turns her back on her husband’s actual policies. It is too inconvenient for her to explain the sources of the deficit reduction in the 1990s besides his (relatively inconsequential) tax increase: first, Clinton’s huge cut in defense spending; then a budget deal with Republicans that reduced the rate of growth of Medicare and cut taxes on capital gains; then, a wondrous flow of revenue into the federal treasury from capital gains and the “rich getting richer.” She doesn’t even mention welfare reform, although it is largely thanks to it that the bottom fifth of families had a 35-percent increase in income from 1991 to 2005. She talks of free trade as something to fear, when President Clinton courageously championed NAFTA and other free-trade initiatives, providing boosts to the U.S. and global economies. Of course, she leaves out all the deregulation and how important it was that President Clinton let Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan pursue his low-inflation policies without political interference. None of this fits into her narrative of an economy needing wide-ranging government intervention to escape the nefarious consequences of individuals left to act “on their own.” One can only conclude that if you liked the 1990s boom, don’t elect this woman.
Who wants to vote Hillary now? clintonsrez_012508.jpg GLAMOUR SHOT Clintons, Rezko As Hillary Clinton continues to insist that she has "no relationship" with shady indicted real estate investor Tony Rezko, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. According to records, Rezko donated $15,000 to the Democratic National Committee in March 2000. At the time, the committee was helmed by longtime Clinton ally Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, who endorsed Hillary Clinton on Wednesday. While it's possible that Rendell and the Clintons discussed neither the donation nor the donor, it's not likely. This morning, on the Today show, Clinton was caught off guard when NBC's Matt Lauer showed a picture of herself, Rezko and husband Bill. Asked if she remembered meeting the man she accused of being a slumlord, she sad no. "No, I don't," Clinton told Lauer. "You know, I probably have taken hundreds of thousands of pictures. I don't know the man, I wouldn't know him if he walked in the door. I don't have a 17-year relationship with him," Clinton said Friday. "There is a big difference between standing somewhere taking a picture with someone you don't know, haven't seen since, and having a relationship."
Caption for this picture of Hillary? Write your own caption (keep within Y!A guidelines please): http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Sen-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-Elise-Amendola/photo//080109/480/0d0ec7e2d5a444978fa742c0eae56d46/;_ylt=AhhZbo9EomafPOg3xH7jnDEDW7oF
So there was a reason for all of those clinton pardons? Pardon Me? Hillary Clinton Takes Cash From Recipients of Husband's Controversial Pardons Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks about her health care policy on Sept. 18, 2007. An examination of Clinton's fundraising donors reveals three donors were pardoned by President Clinton when he was in office. (Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo) By JAKE TAPPER Nov. 15, 2007 Font Size E-mail Print Share Three recipients of controversial 11th-hour pardons issued by former President Bill Clinton in January 2001 have donated thousands of dollars to the presidential campaign of his wife, Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., according to campaign finance records examined by ABC News, in what some good government groups said created an appearance of impropriety. Full Coverage Candidate Bios, Pictures and Favorite Things"It's not illegal," Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told ABC News. "But, of course, it's inappropriate and she should return the money. It does raise the appearance that this is payback. "One can only hope that she wasn't yet aware of who made the donations," said Sloan. "We have raised over $65 million from over 200,000 people," said Clinton campaign manager Howard Wolfson, adding sarcastically, "I appreciate your bringing the instance of this $5,300 and these three people to our attention." Pardonees Donate to Clinton One of the pardonees who has become a donor to Sen. Clinton is David Herdlinger, a former prosecutor in Springdale, Ark., who, according to press accounts at the time of his pardon pleaded guilty in 1986 to mail fraud after taking bribes to reduce or drop charges against defendants charged with drunken driving offenses. Now a life and business coach in Georgia, Herdlinger was pardoned by President Clinton in January 2001; he donated $1,000 to Sen. Clinton's presidential campaign in August. Multimedia Who's Your Candidate? Find Your Presidential Match!Insurance agent Alfredo Regalado, who gave Hillary Clinton $2,000, was pardoned by her husband for failing to "report the transportation of currency in excess of $10,000 into the United States," according to the Department of Justice. Allegedly Mishandled Government Secrets John Deutch is a different case, having served as President Clinton's CIA director. Pardoned by President Clinton for charges he had mishandled government secrets -- but before the Department of Justice could file the proper paperwork against him --
Powered by Yahoo! Answers